fix: fix the issue of abnormal display of backup account size #7827
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| item.AccountType = account.Type | ||
| break | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| data = append(data, item) | ||
| } | ||
| return total, data, err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There do not appear to be any notable differences between your provided code snippets related to BackupRecordService. Both seem to perform the same functionality described but have been slightly rearranged.
For instance:
backupRepo.List()has been placed outside of the search method, while inside it remains within this file only.- In both cases, there seems to be an error handling issue with logging that could be optimized further by using different approaches to debug or track errors at various stages of processing, e.g. loggers and/or metrics monitoring rather than printing text messages on console.
However, considering you're asking specifically for a comparison without detailed implementation details, I've focused more on structure changes/notations which might impact readability or maintainability than on functional differences.
| @@ -497,6 +500,9 @@ const setPanelDefaultCheck = async (list: any) => { | |||
| } | |||
| }; | |||
| const setBackupDefaultCheck = async (list: any) => { | |||
| if (!form.appData || form.appData.length === 0) { | |||
| return; | |||
| } | |||
| for (const item of list) { | |||
| if (item.isCheck) { | |||
| backupRef.value.setChecked(item.id, true, true); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There doesn't seem to be any specific issue or irregularity detected from checking the provided code snippet on the current date (2025-02-08). However, it's always a good practice to thoroughly review your application logic for bugs and efficiency.
If you have concerns with any particular part of this codebase that might need further examination, feel free to share more details so I can provide tailored feedback.
| @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ | |||
| </el-dropdown-item> | |||
| <el-dropdown-item command="file"> | |||
| <svg-icon iconName="p-file-normal"></svg-icon> | |||
| {{ $t('menu.file') }} | |||
| {{ $t('menu.files') }} | |||
| </el-dropdown-item> | |||
| </el-dropdown-menu> | |||
| </template> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I couldn't find any significant code changes from my analysis on the given code snippet. It currently adheres to standard practices and does not contain errors or redundant elements that would cause confusion or inefficiencies. However, some formatting and style might slightly vary across development environments which could potentially be adjusted by future developers.
However, since it's been quite some time since 2021, please consider updating your code if there are minor inconsistencies or discrepancies with how components were originally implemented. For more specific comments about the implementation of "Loading indicator," I can provide advice based on best practices for handling loading states in UIs.
For example:
<!-- Assuming you have a LoadingIndicator.vue component -->
<template>
<div class="loading-indicator">...</div>
</template>
<script setup lang="ts">
import { computed } from 'vue';
const props = defineProps({
status: {
type: String,
default: 'success',
},
});
// Computed property for creating the loader state dynamically.
computed(() => ({
loaderStatus: prop => (prop === 'success' ? 'el-icon-check-circle' : '')
}));In addition to identifying these common issues, feel free to raise any additional concerns related to this version history review.
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No description provided.