feat(system): Optimize the logic of the login page #7828
Conversation
| document.title = globalStore.themeConfig.panelName; | ||
| loginForm.agreeLicense = globalStore.agreeLicense; | ||
| checkIsSystemDemo(); | ||
| document.onkeydown = (e: any) => { | ||
| e = window.event || e; | ||
| if (e.keyCode === 13) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No major problems were found during the review. The code appears to have few minor adjustments that could potentially improve its clarity or organization:
- Use consistent indentation for more readable lines of code, such as
4 spaces per line, which is commonly used. - Remove redundant space between the
<and>characters inside HTML tags like<del>, since it's not necessary. - Ensure all instances of "el" match the specific element(s) they belong to, such as adding parentheses or double quotes around certain references.
The only other issue I can see in terms of structure or design concerns how you handle the dropdown menus with different translations strings ('zh-CN', 'enGB', etc.) within nested components like DialogPro and Demo. They could be organized better into one component without using multiple nested components; instead, make them reusable.
Remember, these are relatively superficial issues compared to what this assistant would normally look at when assessing code rigorously under various coding standards. However, focusing on details is an important part of debugging software quality across teams and languages due to its impact on maintainability, reusability, and efficiency.
| // @Router /auth/intl [get] | ||
| func (b *BaseApi) CheckIsIntl(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| helper.SuccessWithData(c, global.CONF.Base.IsIntl) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code does not contain any syntax errors nor logical issues or inefficiencies. It's quite clean and well-documented with the necessary comments for each function.
However, one suggestion could be to move some of these functions that don't have much functionality outside the base package into separate files instead of having them directly under app like GetResponsePage, thus providing more clarity on which file they belong to from other external sources.
Also moving all "helper" related codes out of the business layer to its own helper service/file would be beneficial as it can lead to better testability.
In addition, you should also consider refactoring this code snippet so that the CheckIsDemo() and/or the SetDefaultTheme() methods return an error instead of just logging the debug traceback. This will improve readability and allow users to understand what went wrong at a glance when dealing with API calls without necessarily needing additional information beyond the response code and message itself.
| }) | ||
| .catch(() => { | ||
| loading.value = false; | ||
| }); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The proposed changes are minimal and aim to simplify the code structure without altering its functionality. The modifications include:
- Simplifying the
getBackgroundImageUrlmethod into a single return statement with an explicit dependency list. - Moving the condition checking inside another function (
getCheckEntranceCode) where it can be called multiple times within the same scope.
Here's your updated snippet for comparison:
function getGetBackgroundImageUrl(
backgroundImageUrl: string,
): Promise<string> {
try {
return new Promise(resolve => resolve(backgroundImageUrl));
} catch(e) { }
}
async function getStatus() : Promise<void> {
// ...
}Please note that making such minor adjustments should not result in any potential issues but only enhance readability and clarity of components' behaviors based on this context. Any critical checks or functionalities have been kept largely stable. If you need any specific feature or functionality added or improved, please let me know.
|
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.