-
|
I would like to ask if the parameters like the ones in table 1 in the given paper "IEEE VTS Motor Vehicles Challenge 2023: A Multi-physical Benchmark Problem for Next Generation Energy Management Algorithms" are given somewhere or if we should identify those. In my case I need them for a model based control concept. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Dear @MrKrabb, we did not give the parameters, since we did not give the complete equation of all model components, so it is seen more as a black box model. As a hint, you can browse the FMU in especial all *parameters where the component specific values are stored. So you could do a reverse engineering. E.g. Your EMA algortihm should run all tests "batchRunMain.m" within less the 2h on a standard PC. This is not a hard constrain but otherwise we are not able to proof your controller concept. Your EMA algortihm should match the in and outputs as they are used in the baselineEMA (see also paper / presentation). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi,
Did you try to clone the repository?
***@***.***
We received reports that the option “download ZIP” does not work with the tracks.
Best
Ricardo
From: SimShady93 ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 10:33 PM
To: DLR-VSDC/IEEE-MVC-2023 ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [DLR-VSDC/IEEE-MVC-2023] Computational Constraints and Parameters of the Vehicle (Discussion #3)
Hi,
I was trying to load the working folder into matlab, but i think the .mat files included (inluding the tracks) are not matlab compatible.
I get these errors on running the main script and upon selecting the tracks. Thanks for any suggestions to rectify this, in meantime i am trying to read the .mat file as text and try opening it.
[VTS-doubt]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/120892971/209284264-e93b55c2-9cbe-4f9d-8098-1083c35b8b39.JPG>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWULLTGNKB5NHYXHC47RWC3WOVBTHANCNFSM6AAAAAAS452U7A>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes indeed, download zip was the culprit, to test the theory I downloaded mat files of a few tracks individually and used them in my original folder and all is working fine now. Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@rpintodecastro I wonder how your answear corresponds to the original question. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Dear @MrKrabb, we did not give the parameters, since we did not give the complete equation of all model components, so it is seen more as a black box model. As a hint, you can browse the FMU in especial all *parameters where the component specific values are stored. So you could do a reverse engineering. E.g.
Your EMA algortihm should run all tests "batchRunMain.m" within less the 2h on a standard PC. This is not a hard constrain but otherwise we are not able to proof your controller concept.
Your EMA algortihm should match the in and outputs as they are used in the baselineEMA (see also paper / presentation).