From 94350305f70348c6b8b6a6cba4729bf3024960c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Nelson Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 16:25:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Minor word choice revision to the discussion on tool trustiness --- RQ5.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/RQ5.tex b/RQ5.tex index da27c41..98050cd 100644 --- a/RQ5.tex +++ b/RQ5.tex @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ \subsection{Tool Mistrust/Transparency}\label{tool_trust} However, the severity of toolset mistrust is not as significant as our interview results suggested. Only 8.26\% of developers indicated that they trust their toolset \textit{a little} or \textit{not at all} (10 out of 121 responses). As the results of the \textit{Barriers Survey} were counter to our interview results, we looked further. -We found that: (1) participants reported on the trust levels of the tools that they regularly use, (2) a large number of participants reported that they had discontinued using toolsets when they ran into errors, and (3) that trust in tools is fluid and changes based on the situations in which they are employed. +We found that: (1) participants reported on the trust levels of the tools that they regularly use, (2) some participants reported that they had discontinued using toolsets when they ran into errors, and (3) that trust in tools is fluid and changes based on the situations in which they are employed. Although we were unable to capture participant trust levels in these discontinued tools, we can observe that participants use (and therefore trust) simple tools more often than complex tools. \begin{table}[!htbp]