You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm pretty sure the idea with this one is for overlapping paladin aura of protection. One could do this by looking at the label, first clause, and if they are the same don't add it. That being said, there are all kinds of other AoE, so does that mean that a AoE spell cast by one actor (cloud kill for example) and the same AoE spell cast by another actor don't stack? That probably is not the case. This could be solved by an additional descriptor but maybe there is a better method ??
Additionally, I think again the original use case, they want the one applied that is better, but what is better, you would need some context if higher is better or lower is better. And what if they have different clauses but the same label?
This one seems more work than it is worth for the number of situations this comes into play. Unless someone is hot on implementing it of course.
Definitely agree.
That's why this issue has been sitting open for nearly 3 years to the day!
Originally the "label" of the Aura was required as the first term after the AURA effect itself, but labels have now been optional for years which makes this even harder to implement.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: