Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional filtering of AURA targets #35

Open
bmos opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Additional filtering of AURA targets #35

bmos opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bmos
Copy link
Collaborator

bmos commented Dec 28, 2023

At the moment, auras can only be filtered by faction.
With a new syntax, it could be possible to also allow other filters like ALIGN in rulesets that support them.
Going further, some additional filtering would be possible such as Kelrugem's IFTAG, although the syntax would likely get more complicated.

@bmos bmos added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 28, 2023
@bmos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmos commented Jun 1, 2024

Something like AURA: 5 good

@rhagelstrom
Copy link
Contributor

rhagelstrom commented Jun 2, 2024

Since neutral is already defined as a faction, do we just want good/evil?

@rhagelstrom
Copy link
Contributor

rhagelstrom commented Jun 2, 2024

At the moment, auras can only be filtered by faction. With a new syntax, it could be possible to also allow other filters like ALIGN in rulesets that support them. Going further, some additional filtering would be possible such as Kelrugem's IFTAG, although the syntax would likely get more complicated.

Seems like something like supporting an extension to do this should more be like have some sort of API to register custom descriptors and then if they want to filter, they can override isAuraApplicatble. I think this same situation comes into play for the stuff Mattkure is doing with Aura Visualized and maybe SR. Force the responsibility back on the author doing extra stuff, so it doesn't become just more maintance here. Aura doesn't really care one way or another if that extra stuff is in or not, so it just seems more natural to have that functionality in whatever ext, but allow them to put in the hooks they need.

@bmos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmos commented Jun 2, 2024

Maybe AURA: 5 align:good or something. I'd hate to not support neutral alignments because there are def Pathfinder magic effects where those would be useful.
This is another one that has a lot of "what ifs" and design decisions that need to be made and without more clamoring for this I'd lean more toward leaving it to the latter clauses of the effect (such as AURA: 5; IF: ALIGN(good); DMG: 5)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants