-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inventory move #1829
Comments
we don't even have invmove checks |
💀 |
so bad |
That sure is one of the responses of all time |
MachineBreaker has an experimental implementation here: #995 |
@Dbbtop As far as I'm aware this does not bypass. I have inv move checks in my fork that have been yet to be merged in that catch this |
this is fried 😭 poor bro has had a PR open since 2023, just merge it or close it idk, 2 year edging streak |
Dont bump issues for no reason, i will continue and merge my PR once i have time |
Describe the bypass and how to replicate it
if (e.getPacket() instanceof ClickSlotC2SPacket click) {
switch (clickBypass.getValue()) {
case GrimSwap -> {
if (click.getActionType() != SlotActionType.PICKUP && click.getActionType() != SlotActionType.PICKUP_ALL)
sendPacket(new CloseHandledScreenC2SPacket(0));
}
Grim version
latest
Server version
1.19.4
Plugins
grim, LP, packetevents
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: