You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, it's only possible to define hurdles like "only the best 50% of the population passes". However, it may also be useful to be able to define hurdles like "only individuals with at least 50% of the fitness of the best individual pass".
As an example, let's consider the following fitness values for the first of two objectives across a population of four individuals: [3, 1, 1, 0]. Using the former hurdle, the first two individuals would be evaluated on the second hurdle (best 50%). Using the latter hurdle, only the first individual would be evaluated on the second hurdle (fitness must be > 1.5, 50% of the best).
The hurdle code should be adapted to support this use case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, it's only possible to define hurdles like "only the best 50% of the population passes". However, it may also be useful to be able to define hurdles like "only individuals with at least 50% of the fitness of the best individual pass".
As an example, let's consider the following fitness values for the first of two objectives across a population of four individuals:
[3, 1, 1, 0]
. Using the former hurdle, the first two individuals would be evaluated on the second hurdle (best 50%). Using the latter hurdle, only the first individual would be evaluated on the second hurdle (fitness must be > 1.5, 50% of the best).The hurdle code should be adapted to support this use case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: