-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
Point socket client to main when CloudFlare protection is disabled #93
Comments
Hi, thanks for notifying me about this, didn't know the beta ended, I asked for an invite for the Slack as well. For now nothing has to be done, but when Bittrex removes CF on the main we should switch it. I'll keep this issue open to not forget. |
UPDATE - Bittrex gave us the heads up in their Slack channel:
|
Thanks for the update, sadly I didn't get an invite for the slack channel yet. I've moved from the beta endpoint to the socket.bittrex.com endpoint. I'll have to look into bypassing CloudFlare again since they state the will enable it whenever it is necessary. Ill create a new issue for that and consider this on closed. |
I asked them to send you an invite just now. |
Please, check your email. I believe they have sent you an invite to their Slack. |
Hello.
In case anyone missed it, about three days ago, Bittrex made the announcement as follows:
From reading Bittrex/beta#22 and comments in Bittrex Slack, my understanding is that:
Note that, Bittrex.Net (CloudFlareUtilities library) might not be able to bypass CloudFlare probably due to this (elcattivo/CloudFlareUtilities#30) problem.
So, for now, we need to use the Beta socket endpoint.
I will report back here when they announce closure of the Beta socket.
@JKorf If you haven't joined Bittrex Slack yet, you most likely can get an invite in the beta#22 thread as you are a Bittrex API wrapper developer. I thought you might be interested since, in the beta#22 thread, the Bittrex guy suggested developers to join their Slack for news and updates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: