Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

General Feedback - Discordance between Participant Logical Model and FHIR Profile #85

Open
a-l-holmes opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

General Feedback - Discordance between Participant Logical Model and FHIR Profile #85

a-l-holmes opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@JamedFV
Labels
Participant Module Tasks or issues related to the Participant Module

Comments

@a-l-holmes
Copy link
Collaborator

What were you reviewing?

Participant Module

Relevant Link:

Participant Logical Model
Participant Profile

Feedback:

The Logical Model suggests that Participant ID and Sex are both required fields (1..1) but the profile says only Participant ID is required

Suggested Improvements:

Correct either the logical model or the profile to display the intended cardinality of those fields

Additional Comments:

Small fix-- hopefully can be corrected with minimal effort and was just a typo🔧

Review Date:

12 December 2024
@a-l-holmes a-l-holmes added the Participant Module Tasks or issues related to the Participant Module label Dec 12, 2024
@mingward
Copy link

Thanks @a-l-holmes. I have the same question. see screenshot below:
Participant Logical Model
image
vs:
Participant Profile
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JamedFV JamedFV

Labels
Participant Module Tasks or issues related to the Participant Module
Projects
FHIR IG v2 Feedback and Development
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mingward @JamedFV @a-l-holmes