PISCES

[jagoosw]

Having been worrying about what dynamic elements we're missing with such a simple model as LOBSTER I've started coding up PISCESv2. It is very complicated with a lot of tracers so may take me a while.

Even if we don't use it much it will be helpful to compare LOBSTER to and is helping me to understand the more complex elements of biogeochemistry. It will also be good to have the gold standard biogeochemical model available for other people to use/improve in the future.

[johnryantaylor]

Thanks - it would be nice to have that implemented!

…

On Sep 8, 2022, 7:11 PM +0100, Jago Strong-Wright ***@***.***>, wrote: Having been worrying about what dynamic elements we're missing with such a simple model as LOBSTER I've started coding up PISCESv2. It is very complicated with a lot of tracers so may take me a while. Even if we don't use it much it will be helpful to compare LOBSTER to and is helping me to understand the more complex elements of biogeochemistry. It will also be good to have the gold standard biogeochemical model available for other people to use/improve in the future. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Atreyu-94]

Is this still under consideration?

[jagoosw]

Closed by #178

[jagoosw]

Hey @Atreyu-94,

Just to let you know, we've just merged a working version of PISCES into main.

We haven't been able to validate it against the Fortran implementations yet but plan on doing it soon.

[Atreyu-94]

Thank you very much for letting me know! It's still not documented, right?