Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenMP firstprivate clashes with NVIDIA compiler #20

Open
mknaranja opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

OpenMP firstprivate clashes with NVIDIA compiler #20

mknaranja opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mknaranja
Copy link
Member

When using CUDA with NVC++ on branch `15-consider-cuda-implementation-of-essential-code-parts, we get a lot of

NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)
NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)
NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)
NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)
NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)
NVC++-S-0155-A possibly throwing copy constructor for a task firstprivate variable is not supported  (/gpfsscratch/rech/emp/utd66dd/cuda/GMGPolar/src/smoother.cpp: 2291)

messages caused by lines like https://github.com/mknaranja/GMGPolar/blob/15-consider-cuda-implementation-of-essential-code-parts/src/smoother.cpp#L2291

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant