You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, "ratings" are based on a participants talking time in relation to the length of the meeting.
<= 50: green
50 < 75: yellow
<= 75: red (shaking)
<= 90: dark red (big shake)
In early development this made sense, but as time goes on I think it isn't calibrated well.
What if we took the number of participants into consideration in ratings? So if there are two participants in the meeting, anything higher than 50% would be red. And if there are four, anything higher than 25%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, "ratings" are based on a participants talking time in relation to the length of the meeting.
In early development this made sense, but as time goes on I think it isn't calibrated well.
What if we took the number of participants into consideration in ratings? So if there are two participants in the meeting, anything higher than 50% would be red. And if there are four, anything higher than 25%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: