Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chat over Solid using an existing chat UI #107

Open
jeswr opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Chat over Solid using an existing chat UI #107

jeswr opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
challenge technical problem applied to a use case proposal: changes needed 👷

Comments

@jeswr
Copy link

jeswr commented Apr 30, 2023

Pitch

Current Solid chat-apps build their interface from the ground-up often giving them an "unpolished" look. Let's show that Solid apps can look polished by using an existing chat UI such as Slack, Mattermost and adding a plugin to read/write to Solid Storage.

Desired solution

NA

Acceptance criteria

I can use the product to chat with owners of other Solid Pods who are using a chat app of their choice.

Pointers

Scenarios

NA

@jeswr jeswr added challenge technical problem applied to a use case proposal: pending ❓ labels Apr 30, 2023
@jeswr jeswr changed the title Chat over Solid using an existing chat app Chat over Solid using an existing chat UI Apr 30, 2023
@pheyvaer pheyvaer assigned jeswr and unassigned RubenVerborgh May 2, 2023
@pheyvaer
Copy link
Contributor

pheyvaer commented May 2, 2023

Can you also provide the desired solution and have a concrete list of steps that for the acceptance criteria? Thanks!

@josephguillaume
Copy link

In case it's useful, work on a slack-solid bridge was mentioned in the SolidOS room

https://matrix.to/#/!wAfwwonbRnRLYejFOR%3Agitter.im/%24tpfupSKuh5a7twFqUayCnTUTyMMTHOwcaU81TsYFVjs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
challenge technical problem applied to a use case proposal: changes needed 👷
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants