Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apportion the space in the paradigm layouts better #66

Open
aarppe opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Apportion the space in the paradigm layouts better #66

aarppe opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@aarppe
Copy link

aarppe commented Jun 26, 2023

In the refactoring, there appears to be an imbalance in terms of how much space is allocated to the row-label cells in comparison to the content cells, e.g.

image

I'm not convinced we need to have so much space to the left of the row labels. And it appears that the content cells are designated less space than the row label cells, when it probably should be the other way around.

Generally, I'd be inclined for some form of dynamic space allocation, based on the available screen size and then maximal length of the content. Though we might need to allow for row labels to be split on multiple lines. Would this be possible in principle?

@aarppe aarppe added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 26, 2023
@aarppe
Copy link
Author

aarppe commented Jul 20, 2023

Still - why is there so much space provided for the row labels, in comparison to the associated cell content?

image

@Eluviian
Copy link
Contributor

I had tried different amounts of space and found that less space started to look awkward and unbalanced, especially on larger screens (computer monitors). It has been reduced some since this screenshot, but I can reduce it more. Could I get some guidance on how much to reduce the space on the left? By half? More than that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants