Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

borgbackup missing on your comparison list #11

Open
ThomasWaldmann opened this issue May 10, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

borgbackup missing on your comparison list #11

ThomasWaldmann opened this issue May 10, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@ThomasWaldmann
Copy link

Hi,

borgbackup developer here (borg is a fork of attic, with lots of fixes and some new features).

Just found your stuff, looks like we share some common goals / opinions about backup software, so it might be interesting to add borgbackup to your comparison list of backup tools.

If you want to have a look, easiest way is to use our binary build for testing.

https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/releases

Cheers, Thomas

@ThomasWaldmann
Copy link
Author

Ah, and restic also (you found it already and I found your project via that). :)

@X-Ryl669
Copy link
Owner

Do you agree with this feature list ?

  1. Borg has deduplication based on rolling checksum so it should be also optimal for insert/delete
  2. It then hash & compress (LZ4/Zlib/LZMA) the chunks
  3. It then encrypt them
  4. It has a FUSE tool to mount the archive as a filesystem
  5. It can not delete previous iteration of backup
  6. If install on a remote server, it does a kind of "rsync" (please be more descriptive) to avoid long transfer of the backup archive increment
  7. Python based.

@ThomasWaldmann
Copy link
Author

1, 2 ok
3 encrypt-then-mac
4,7 ok
5 no, you can delete any archive you like
6 it transfers the chunks it has not yet in the repository

@sergeevabc
Copy link

Windows user sees no binary, sad.

@ThomasWaldmann
Copy link
Author

@sergeevabc there is no native windows support yet, but experimental support for cygwin and WSL.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants