Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
76 lines (44 loc) · 2.96 KB

ibat-gov.md

File metadata and controls

76 lines (44 loc) · 2.96 KB

IBAT 3.0 Progress Report

Delivery to date

15 August 2018

key components delivered

note: referred to detailed plan

Highlights

Complete user journey

Engaging marketing pages

modern maps

Reports overhaul

Delivery priorities

note: late stage, prioritise the delivery, reports, reports EIB addition, country profile defer

Remains...

estimate 159 developer days remaining

(or 5 developers full time 6 weeks)

Budget

15 August 2018 note: because of the above changes. It's hard to put an accurate figure on current spending

2/3 spent, > 1/2 delivered

note: challenges, we have re-visited a lo

WCMC estimated to go above budget by 20%

Timeline and Sprints

15 August 2018

four sprints to go

reports and user management system

Challenges

capacity

note: the reason behind underspending per projection; according to technical lead, the busiest time in four years; added capacity, including an agency frontend developer; channel, prioritise developer time. projected to substantially increases in the remaining Sprints

communications

note: involving four partners, multiple committees. Try to keep partners informed, everything is shared - all planners including finance forecast, at the finest level is available, understand time is limited. Nevertheless, memory Fine details requires approval, not most effective Involving more time, We have document and communicate, multiple iterations, and evolving and conflicting features, put in writing, what has agreed by whom and when, parked decisions and deferred, actions points to follow up. Take opportunities of show and tell, direct + high level communication

decision making

note: redevelopment is not replication. We took the opportunity to re-open topics of interest, from user journey perspective, what makes intepretation easy. For example, scientists and business actors may be different. Compromises are made. Views, priorities are different - sometimes they come directly to the implementing team, without communicating to ER and her agreement. Lack of proper consultation We have clearer decision making process, also imperative that we adopt this approach to ensure timely delivery now. GC could strengthen this mechanism and provide clear instruction of decision making process

estimate

note: IBAT is a complex system, evolved through multiple engineering cycles. Some complexities have not been and cannot fully captured in the proposal stage. For example, reports as budgeted in the contract do not reflect at all the unique requirement of individual report type that by itself contain technical complexity as well as business challenges such as consultation and agreement. For example he data filters have gone through 3 iterations after consultation. These are important overhead but nevertheless not been budgeted sufficiently. This will likely result in increased project time and expenditure.

Key milestone

user acceptance test
1 Oct - 12 Oct

release
25 Oct