-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
why we not support jdk 8? #33
Comments
You are right. I will make it so that the next release supports JDK >= 8. I don't wanna mess this up though, so I need to check carefully what needs to change. For sure the Thanks for reporting this! |
After some testing I realized I used more Java > 8 features than I expected. I still plan to do this but it will require a bit more time than expected. |
I was able to bump my java version to 17 but now I am getting a runtime exception at startup:
There is a bunch of |
I would need to test it, but the lowest I ever tried is 3.1.3. What version are you using? |
Ah ok, I am at 2.5.5. That is way to low, I've been meaning to bring it up to date so I will do that. |
HI! Doesn't it support old version of hibernate (5.x.x) versions?
import javax.persistence.Entity; |
Hi, I have not tested with older Hibernate versions but what I can grasp from the error is that it might be related to the I'd really like to avoid this so If somebody with more experience is aware of a different method to ship just one version that supports both (assuming it's possible) it'd be awesome. |
who is 'most'? why ask the developer to spend his time making this amazing library work because you are too lazy to upgrade? |
Not all production projects are new versions, most of us are still at jdk8.
please think about this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: