Update 5.46

[blmaier]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

• ℹ️ License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12263897839. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[blmaier]

Note this is the correct SPDX license identifier. It's a identifier specifically for file.
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause-Darwin.html

The linter warns about it as it appears to be more recently added to SPDX. I opened a PR to smithy to update the SPDX license list.
conda-forge/conda-smithy#2177

[blmaier]

@chrisburr @mariusvniekerk @mrakitin could I get a review on this?

[blmaier]

Hi @conda-forge/core, this repo appears to be abandoned, could you look at it?

[h-vetinari]

Thanks for reviving this feedstock!