You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was a statistical test proposed at some point, but given it is not in place yet and given that verified quotes will probably not work for native price estimates, should we maybe consider adding some very loose limits on the native price estimates?
Something like "no token has a price more than, say 100 ETH?"
Not sure if this is a rare case, and I guess one would need to search in the logs (not sure how to do a '>' test in the logs though) to find out how often we have such cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We noticed an issue with at least one native price estimation, namely this token
0x48Fb253446873234F2fEBbF9BdeAA72d9d387f94
that was often reported by OneInchSpotPrice estimator to be worth ~79M ETH.
see logs here
There was a statistical test proposed at some point, but given it is not in place yet and given that verified quotes will probably not work for native price estimates, should we maybe consider adding some very loose limits on the native price estimates?
Something like "no token has a price more than, say 100 ETH?"
Not sure if this is a rare case, and I guess one would need to search in the logs (not sure how to do a '>' test in the logs though) to find out how often we have such cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: