Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an indication that GeoPolars isn't production-ready, and its dev is on-hold #432

Closed
DeflateAwning opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #433
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@DeflateAwning
Copy link

DeflateAwning commented Feb 12, 2025

GeoPolars, linked in the Rust section, will be awesome when its development resumes (or an alternative comes along).

At the top of its readme, there an update that reads:

Update (August 2024): GeoPolars is pola-rs/polars#1830 (comment) on Polars supporting pola-rs/polars#9112, which would allow GeoPolars to persist geometry type information and coordinate reference system (CRS) metadata. It's not feasible to create a geopolars.GeoDataFrame as a subclass of a polars.DataFrame (similar to how the geopandas.GeoDataFrame is a subclass of pandas.DataFrame) because polars explicitly pola-rs/polars#2846 (comment). See geopolars/geopolars#240.

With this, I would suggest adding an indication that it's pre-alpha and not in active development.

I would suggest removing it from the list, but I think it's best to leave it on the list to indicate that it's a project that exists (and the only one of its kind currently), but that it's not the current Polars direction.

@ddotta
Copy link
Owner

ddotta commented Feb 14, 2025

Thanks @DeflateAwning for this issue.
You're right, I'll just add the pre-alpha indication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants