Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrading aws dependencies #53

Closed
Timshel opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Upgrading aws dependencies #53

Timshel opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@Timshel
Copy link

Timshel commented Jun 16, 2016

Hello,

We are using aws-wrap as a dependency in commons-aws, do you intend to upgrade the aws dependencies ?

In the negative can we reuse the the code wrapping CloudWatch, S3 and SQS ?

Have a nice day.

@dwhitney
Copy link
Contributor

+1 (I think you should submit a PR)

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Jacques B. notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hello,

We are using aws-wrap as a dependency in commons-aws
https://github.com/MfgLabs/commons-aws, do you intend to upgrade the
aws dependencies ?

In the negative can we reuse the the code wrapping CloudWatch, S3 and SQS ?

Have a nice day.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#53, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AACCoTxZM9j6LfoeRpAF4ZtqH5hrIJnTks5qMRPVgaJpZM4I3Lhs
.

@Timshel
Copy link
Author

Timshel commented Jun 16, 2016

There already is such a PR: #50 in which the version can probably be bumped to 1.10.77.

@mingchuno
Copy link

mingchuno commented Jul 16, 2016

@Timshel @dwhitney
I have forked this repo and published it under version 0.9.0
https://github.com/mingchuno/aws-wrap

Can you please check if you still have any problems? If yes, please submit an issue there

@Timshel Timshel closed this as completed Jul 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants