Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] UWP Support Improvements #158

Open
joeyoropesa-dev opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Suggestion] UWP Support Improvements #158

joeyoropesa-dev opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@joeyoropesa-dev
Copy link

What you think about spliting electronjs files (electron.exe and so on..) and electron app into two different UWPs. One to work as ElectronJS Runtime while other UWP will simply have only electron app files in for example, lib directory while on Assets and AppxManifest will have basic informations about electron app and of course much shorten ghost.app. That could help distributing Electron-UWP apps faster since all of those Electron apps inside UWP will use UWP-based Electron runtime to run.

I'm working on similar project but getting issues like Process executed with exit code: 101457950 error codes and so on... Anyway, it would be nice to see more people working on the same interesting concept - especially if Electron decides to do it by themselfs with community : )

Thank you for your hard and great work and thank you for your understanding.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant