Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/materialize cratedb #2452

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

surister
Copy link
Contributor

@surister surister commented Feb 26, 2025

Description:

First draft of CrateDB connector, it still has uknown issues, if merged please set it to BETA.

I did commits as atomic as I could.

Pending known issues:

  • Integer/numeric usage might be flaky: I used Numeric(22) across the board to try and get the tests pass), compatibility with other compatible numeric types should be checked.
  • 2025-02-26T10:53:59.523479Z ERROR ops: commit failed: store at index 0: ERROR: Character N is neither a decimal digit number, decimal point, nor "e" notation exponential mark. (SQLSTATE XX000) fields={}
  • Objects/JSON has to be re-checked tested.
  • Temp tables need to be manually deleted after
  • 2025-02-26T11:09:11.095578Z ERROR ops: commit failed: store at index 33: ERROR: Cannot detect the type of the value: 18446744073709551615 (SQLSTATE XX000) fields={}

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@williamhbaker williamhbaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of small changes needed before we can merge this beta version.

@surister surister force-pushed the feature/materialize-cratedb branch from a708694 to ea9afaf Compare February 27, 2025 15:32
Copy link
Member

@williamhbaker williamhbaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for a beta version

@williamhbaker williamhbaker merged commit 5b7811a into estuary:main Feb 27, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants