Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EOF Implementers Call #68 #1312

Closed
poojaranjan opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 6 comments
Closed

EOF Implementers Call #68 #1312

poojaranjan opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 6 comments
Labels
Breakout Type: Topic-specific breakout calls EOF Series: EVM Object Format Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor

poojaranjan commented Feb 19, 2025

EOF Implementers Call #68

Agenda

Other comments and resources

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Discourse Topic ID: 22915

Copy link

Discourse Topic ID: 22915

@pdobacz
Copy link

pdobacz commented Feb 26, 2025

To add to the agenda:

  • Creator Contract from EIP-7873 - how feature-rich should it be? And specifically, should it include a flag to include CALLER in the final_salt for non-frontrunnable deploys? Background: discussion in this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added Breakout Type: Topic-specific breakout calls EOF Series: EVM Object Format Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer labels Feb 26, 2025
Copy link

Discourse Topic ID: 22915

@pdobacz
Copy link

pdobacz commented Feb 27, 2025

To add to the agenda:

  • confirm removal of 0xff prefix in the new TX/EOFCREATE hashing scheme (just keccak256(sender | salt))

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rcording: https://youtu.be/ay58x4yv9kc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Breakout Type: Topic-specific breakout calls EOF Series: EVM Object Format Execution Layer: Issues that affect the execution layer
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants