Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logic to correctly evaluate Dragon Slayer spell for AI #8707

Open
1 task done
ihhub opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #9618
Open
1 task done

Add logic to correctly evaluate Dragon Slayer spell for AI #8707

ihhub opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #9618
Assignees
Labels
AI Artificial intelligence behaviour improvement New feature, request or improvement
Milestone

Comments

@ihhub
Copy link
Owner

ihhub commented May 22, 2024

Preliminary checks

Describe the problem requiring a solution

At the moment we do not have a proper code to apply this spell by AI heroes (see ai_normal_spell.cpp file, line 462).

Describe the possible solution

We need to have this logic for AI to effectively use the spell.

Additional info

No response

@ihhub ihhub added improvement New feature, request or improvement AI Artificial intelligence behaviour labels May 22, 2024
@ihhub ihhub added this to the 1.1.1 milestone May 22, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.1, 1.1.2 Jul 13, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.2, 1.1.3 Sep 15, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.3, 1.1.4 Oct 23, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.4, 1.1.5 Nov 27, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.5, 1.1.6 Dec 30, 2024
@ihhub ihhub modified the milestones: 1.1.6, 1.1.7 Feb 16, 2025
@ihhub ihhub self-assigned this Mar 9, 2025
@ihhub ihhub linked a pull request Mar 9, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI Artificial intelligence behaviour improvement New feature, request or improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant