Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a license #15

Open
JortvD opened this issue Jan 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Add a license #15

JortvD opened this issue Jan 17, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@JortvD
Copy link
Collaborator

JortvD commented Jan 17, 2021

We need to choose a license for this repository (and all of the others). That begs the question: which license? I am personally in favor of a GPL license, as MIT has some quirks I'm not that fond of. A GPL license, however, might have the consequence that the adoption of ijo will be lessened.

@TheOtterlord
Copy link
Contributor

I've been looking at choose a license, and using GPL could lead to reduced adoption? But I suppose it depends on how it is used. What parts of the MIT license do you not like/want?
I'm not really worried about people distributing closed source versions of ijo, but I suppose it is something to consider.

@JortvD
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JortvD commented Jan 17, 2021

What parts of the MIT license do you not like/want?

I'm more against the start of closed source ecosystems for ijo. Where companies, for example, create a closed source version of ijo and then start making plugins that will only work for their closed source version.

... using GPL could lead to reduced adoption?

In the case that a company or person would only use ijo because it would be able to create a close version under a MIT license.

@TheOtterlord
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I guess that GPL is probably best then. Since closed source versions don't really contribute to the overall ecosystem and proper adoption 🤔

@TheOtterlord
Copy link
Contributor

After reading about elastic search and the recent developments, I think GPL is a good fit for the project. It definitely is beneficial to have everything open.

@JortvD
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JortvD commented Jan 30, 2021

Yes interesting move indeed, but I vow to never change the license when it has been set ;).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants