Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

membership and licensing #12

Closed
pennyl67 opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

membership and licensing #12

pennyl67 opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@pennyl67
Copy link
Contributor

There are specific licensing/pricing conditions associated with members of organisations, groups, networks, etc. (e.g. ELRA, LDC, MetaShare, etc.); for instance, members of a specific group may have a privileged access to a resource or use it at a privileged price. How can this be better represented?

  • initially, we had the individuals 'onlyMSmembers' (conditionsOfUse) and 'memberOfELRA' , 'memberOfLDC' and 'memberOfTST-Centrale' (userNature)
  • in the new XSD version, there's a membershipInfo, with the elements 'member' (boolean value system) and membershipInstitution (string), but I don't find this as the most appealing solution for the ontology.
    Note: Should we also represent non-membership? Or is the absence of a feature sufficient?
@pennyl67
Copy link
Contributor Author

The whole licensing & billing module should be updated; to be done under #10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant