You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are specific licensing/pricing conditions associated with members of organisations, groups, networks, etc. (e.g. ELRA, LDC, MetaShare, etc.); for instance, members of a specific group may have a privileged access to a resource or use it at a privileged price. How can this be better represented?
initially, we had the individuals 'onlyMSmembers' (conditionsOfUse) and 'memberOfELRA' , 'memberOfLDC' and 'memberOfTST-Centrale' (userNature)
in the new XSD version, there's a membershipInfo, with the elements 'member' (boolean value system) and membershipInstitution (string), but I don't find this as the most appealing solution for the ontology.
Note: Should we also represent non-membership? Or is the absence of a feature sufficient?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are specific licensing/pricing conditions associated with members of organisations, groups, networks, etc. (e.g. ELRA, LDC, MetaShare, etc.); for instance, members of a specific group may have a privileged access to a resource or use it at a privileged price. How can this be better represented?
Note: Should we also represent non-membership? Or is the absence of a feature sufficient?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: