From 44cbb26220e4c0bc5aec75022975a26bf8ecf13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Simon <daniel.attila.simon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:00:30 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] test: fix failing test case after changing revert reason

---
 test/Governance.t.sol | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/Governance.t.sol b/test/Governance.t.sol
index 41a43f2..6cb70ee 100644
--- a/test/Governance.t.sol
+++ b/test/Governance.t.sol
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ abstract contract GovernanceTest is Test {
         vm.warp(block.timestamp + governance.EPOCH_DURATION());
 
         // should revert if the initiative isn't registered
-        vm.expectRevert("Governance: initiative-not-registered");
+        vm.expectRevert("Governance: cannot-unregister-initiative");
         governance.unregisterInitiative(baseInitiative3);
 
         governance.registerInitiative(baseInitiative3);
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ abstract contract GovernanceTest is Test {
         assertEq(atEpoch, governance.epoch());
 
         // should revert if the initiative is still in the registration warm up period
-        vm.expectRevert("Governance: initiative-in-warm-up");
+        vm.expectRevert("Governance: cannot-unregister-initiative");
         /// @audit should fail due to not waiting enough time
         governance.unregisterInitiative(baseInitiative3);