Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How advanced DeepOnet can be compatible with simple Fully-connected networks #41

Open
LVJIAQI777 opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@LVJIAQI777
Copy link

Hello Dr. Lu,
Thank you very much for the DeepXDE you developed. I would like to ask you a question about DeepOnets.
It is reasonable that advanced DeepOnet can be compatible with simple FNN.
For example, in a simple house price prediction problem, we have 2 inputs, like the size and age of the house. Then, we want to predict the price of the house.
There seems to be no trunk net counterpart in this example. So, how do we implement a simple FNN with DeepOnet?
I do know that I can use FNN directly. I'm still trying to figure out how to be compatible with a simple network using DeepOnet architecture.
Could you please answer my confusion? I am looking forward to your reply!

@lululxvi
Copy link
Owner

In this case, FNN seems good enough. Why do you have to use DeepONet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants