-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathbibliotheek.bib
3890 lines (3890 loc) · 371 KB
/
bibliotheek.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@book{Cohen1988,
address = {Hilsdale},
author = {Cohen, J.},
publisher = {Lawrence Earlbaum Associates},
title = {{Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences}},
year = {1988}
}
@article{efron2007,
abstract = {Modern scientific technology has provided a new class of large-scale simultaneous inference problems, with thousands of hypothe-sis tests to consider at the same time. Microarrays epitomize this type of technology, but similar situations arise in proteomics, spec-troscopy, imaging, and social science surveys. This paper uses false discovery rate methods to carry out both size and power calculations on large-scale problems. A simple empirical Bayes approach allows the false discovery rate (fdr) analysis to proceed with a minimum of frequentist or Bayesian modeling assumptions. Closed-form accuracy formulas are derived for estimated false discovery rates, and used to compare different methodologies: local or tail-area fdr's, theoretical, permutation, or empirical null hypothesis estimates. Two microarray data sets as well as simulations are used to evaluate the methodology, the power diagnostics showing why nonnull cases might easily fail to appear on a list of " significant " discoveries.},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
arxivId = {arXiv:0710.2245v1},
author = {Efron, Bradley},
doi = {10.1214/009053606000001460},
eprint = {arXiv:0710.2245v1},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/efron.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0090-5364},
issn = {00905364},
journal = {Annals of Statistics},
keywords = {Empirical Bayes,Empirical null,Large-scale simultaneous inference,Local false discovery rates},
number = {4},
pages = {1351--1377},
title = {{Size, power and false discovery rates}},
volume = {35},
year = {2007}
}
@incollection{Henson2007,
abstract = {This chapter begins with an overview of the various types of experimental design, before proceeding to vari- ous modelling choices, such as the use of events versus epochs. It then covers some practical issues concerning the effective temporal sampling of blood oxygenation- level-dependent (BOLD) responses and the problem of different slice acquisition times. The final and main part of the chapter concerns the statistical efficiency of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) designs, as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and the ordering of different stimulus-types. These consider- ations allow researchers to optimize the efficiency of their fMRI designs.},
author = {Henson, R.},
booktitle = {Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images},
doi = {10.1016/B978-012372560-8/50015-2},
file = {:Users/Joke/Documents/Onderzoek/ProjectsOngoing/DesignEfficiency/Literature/Henson{\_}SPM{\_}06{\_}preprint.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780123725608},
issn = {10518215},
pages = {193--210},
pmid = {1000104770},
title = {{Efficient experimental design for fMRI}},
year = {2007}
}
@article{Zehetmayer2015,
author = {Zehetmayer, Sonja and Graf, Alexandra C. and Posch, Martin},
doi = {10.1515/sagmb-2014-0025},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Zehetmayer, Graf, Posch - 2015 - Sample size reassessment for a two-stage design controlling the false discovery rate.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1544-6115 (Electronic)1544-6115 (Linking)},
issn = {1544-6115, 2194-6302},
journal = {Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology},
keywords = {adaptive design,false discovery rate,high-dimensional data,two-stage design},
number = {5},
pages = {429--442},
pmid = {26461844},
title = {{Sample size reassessment for a two-stage design controlling the false discovery rate}},
url = {http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sagmb.2015.14.issue-5/sagmb-2014-0025/sagmb-2014-0025.xml},
volume = {14},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Cheng2015,
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
arxivId = {1503.01328},
author = {Cheng, Dan and Schwartzman, Armin},
doi = {arXiv:1503.01328},
eprint = {1503.01328},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Cheng, Schwartzman - 2015 - On the explicit height distribution and expected number of local maxima of isotropic Gaussian Random Fiel(2).pdf:pdf},
issn = {1572915X},
journal = {biorXiv},
keywords = {Euler characteristic,Gaussian orthogonal ensemble,Height,Isotropic field,Local maxima,Overshoot,Riemannian manifold,Sphere},
title = {{On the explicit height distribution and expected number of local maxima of isotropic Gaussian Random Fields}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Eklund2016,
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
arxivId = {1511.01863},
author = {Eklund, Anders and Nichols, Thomas E. and Knutsson, Hans},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1602413113},
eprint = {1511.01863},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Eklund, Nichols, Knutsson - 2016 - Cluster failure Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0027-8424},
issn = {0027-8424},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
pages = {201602413},
pmid = {27357684},
title = {{Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates}},
url = {http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1602413113},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Skol2006,
abstract = {Genome-wide association is a promising approach to identify common genetic variants that predispose to human disease. Because of the high cost of genotyping hundreds of thousands of markers on thousands of subjects, genome-wide association studies often follow a staged design in which a proportion (pi(samples)) of the available samples are genotyped on a large number of markers in stage 1, and a proportion (pi(samples)) of these markers are later followed up by genotyping them on the remaining samples in stage 2. The standard strategy for analyzing such two-stage data is to view stage 2 as a replication study and focus on findings that reach statistical significance when stage 2 data are considered alone. We demonstrate that the alternative strategy of jointly analyzing the data from both stages almost always results in increased power to detect genetic association, despite the need to use more stringent significance levels, even when effect sizes differ between the two stages. We recommend joint analysis for all two-stage genome-wide association studies, especially when a relatively large proportion of the samples are genotyped in stage 1 (pi(samples) {\textgreater}or= 0.30), and a relatively large proportion of markers are selected for follow-up in stage 2 (pi(markers) {\textgreater}or= 0.01).},
author = {Skol, Andrew D and Scott, Laura J and Abecasis, Gon{\c{c}}alo R and Boehnke, Michael},
doi = {10.1038/ng1706},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/ng1706.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1061-4036 (Print)$\backslash$r1061-4036 (Linking)},
issn = {1061-4036},
journal = {Nature genetics},
number = {2},
pages = {209--213},
pmid = {16415888},
title = {{Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.}},
volume = {38},
year = {2006}
}
@article{Hughett2007,
author = {Hughett, Paul},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Hughett - 2007 - Accurate Computation of the F-to-z and t-to-z Transforms for Large Arguments.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1548-7660},
issn = {1548-7660},
journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
keywords = {a set of images,and mazziotta 1997,at each voxel of,dolan,evaluates some statistical hypothesis,f -to- z transform,floating-point precision,frackowiak,friston,frith,spm,statistical computation,statistical parametric mapping,t -to- z,transform,which have been registered},
number = {1},
pages = {1--5},
title = {{Accurate Computation of the F-to-z and t-to-z Transforms for Large Arguments}},
url = {http://www.jstatsoft.org/v23/c01},
volume = {23},
year = {2007}
}
@article{Byrd1995,
author = {Byrd, RH and Lu, P and Nocedal, J and Zhu, C},
journal = {SIAM Journal on scientific computing},
number = {5},
pages = {1190--1208},
title = {{A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization}},
volume = {16},
year = {1995}
}
@article{Kiebel1999,
abstract = {The assessment of significant activations in functional imaging using voxel-based methods often relies on results derived from the theory of Gaussian random fields. These results solve the multiple comparison problem and assume that the spatial correlation or smoothness of the data is known or can be estimated. End results (i. e., P values associated with local maxima, clusters, or sets of clusters) critically depend on this assessment, which should be as exact and as reliable as possible. In some earlier implementations of statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (SPM94, SPM95) the smoothness was assessed on Gaussianized t-fields (Gt-f) that are not generally free of physiological signal. This technique has two limitations. First, the estimation is not stable (the variance of the estimator being far from negligible) and, second, physiological signal in the Gt-f will bias the estimation. In this paper, we describe an estimation method that overcomes these drawbacks. The new approach involves estimating the smoothness of standardized residual fields which approximates the smoothness of the component fields of the associated t-field. Knowing the smoothness of these component fields is important because it allows one to compute corrected P values for statistical fields other than the t-field or the Gt-f (e.g., the F-map) and eschews bias due to deviation from the null hypothesis. We validate the method on simulated data and demonstrate it using data from a functional MRI study.},
author = {Kiebel, S J and Poline, J B and Friston, K J and Holmes, a P and Worsley, K J},
doi = {10.1006/nimg.1999.0508},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Kiebel et al. - 1999 - Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1053-8119 (Print)$\backslash$r1053-8119 (Linking)},
issn = {1053-8119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
number = {6},
pages = {756--766},
pmid = {10600421},
title = {{Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model.}},
volume = {10},
year = {1999}
}
@misc{JohnWhitehead2001,
author = {{John Whitehead}, Susan Todd, Anne Whitehead, Nigel Stallard},
booktitle = {British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology},
language = {en},
month = {may},
number = {5},
pages = {393},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
title = {{Interim analyses in clinical trials}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2014469/},
volume = {51},
year = {2001}
}
@misc{SPM,
address = {London, UK},
author = {Ashburner, J and Friston, Karl J and Penny, W. D.},
title = {{SPM}},
year = {2012}
}
@misc{R,
address = {Vienna, Austria},
author = {{R Core Team}},
publisher = {R foundation for statistical computing},
title = {{R: A language and environment for statistical computing}},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Kirk1996,
author = {Kirk, Roger E.},
journal = {Educational and psychological measurement},
pages = {746----759},
title = {{Practical significance: a concept whose time has come}},
volume = {56},
year = {1996}
}
@article{Thyreau2012,
abstract = {In this paper we investigate the use of classical fMRI Random Effect (RFX) group statistics when analyzing a very large cohort and the possible improvement brought from anatomical information. Using 1326 subjects from the IMAGEN study, we first give a global picture of the evolution of the group effect t-value from a simple face-watching contrast with increasing cohort size. We obtain a wide activated pattern, far from being limited to the reasonably expected brain areas, illustrating the difference between statistical significance and practical significance. This motivates us to inject tissue-probability information into the group estimation, we model the BOLD contrast using a matter-weighted mixture of Gaussians and compare it to the common, single-Gaussian model. In both cases, the model parameters are estimated per-voxel for one subgroup, and the likelihood of both models is computed on a second, separate subgroup to reflect model generalization capacity. Various group sizes are tested, and significance is asserted using a 10-fold cross-validation scheme. We conclude that adding matter information consistently improves the quantitative analysis of BOLD responses in some areas of the brain, particularly those where accurate inter-subject registration remains challenging.},
author = {Thyreau, Benjamin and Schwartz, Yannick and Thirion, Bertrand and Frouin, Vincent and Loth, Eva and Vollst{\"{a}}dt-Klein, Sabine and Paus, Tomas and Artiges, Eric and Conrod, Patricia J and Schumann, Gunter and Whelan, Robert and Poline, Jean-Baptiste},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.083},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Thyreau et al. - 2012 - Very large fMRI study using the IMAGEN database sensitivity-specificity and population effect modeling in relati.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Algorithms,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: anatomy {\&} histology,Databases, Factual,Humans,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Models, Neurological,Models, Statistical,Normal Distribution,Oxygen,Oxygen: blood,Population,Reproducibility of Results},
month = {may},
number = {1},
pages = {295--303},
pmid = {22425669},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Very large fMRI study using the IMAGEN database: sensitivity-specificity and population effect modeling in relation to the underlying anatomy.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425669},
volume = {61},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Poldrack2012,
author = {Poldrack, RA},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.007.The},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/nihms609319.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Neuroimage},
keywords = {cognitive neuroscience,connectivity,fmri,functional magnetic resonance imaging,i was unaware of,in 1989,it may come as,meta-analysis,no,ongoing race to develop,ontology,school for cognitive psychology,the,when i began graduate},
number = {2},
pages = {1216--1220},
title = {{The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911008949},
volume = {62},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Poldrack2013,
abstract = {The large-scale sharing of task-based functional neuroimaging data has the potential to allow novel insights into the organization of mental function in the brain, but the field of neuroimaging has lagged behind other areas of bioscience in the development of data sharing resources. This paper describes the OpenFMRI project (accessible online at http://www.openfmri.org), which aims to provide the neuroimaging community with a resource to support open sharing of task-based fMRI studies. We describe the motivation behind the project, focusing particularly on how this project addresses some of the well-known challenges to sharing of task-based fMRI data. Results from a preliminary analysis of the current database are presented, which demonstrate the ability to classify between task contrasts with high generalization accuracy across subjects, and the ability to identify individual subjects from their activation maps with moderately high accuracy. Clustering analyses show that the similarity relations between statistical maps have a somewhat orderly relation to the mental functions engaged by the relevant tasks. These results highlight the potential of the project to support large-scale multivariate analyses of the relation between mental processes and brain function.},
author = {Poldrack, Russell a and Barch, Deanna M and Mitchell, Jason P and Wager, Tor D and Wagner, Anthony D and Devlin, Joseph T and Cumba, Chad and Koyejo, Oluwasanmi and Milham, Michael P},
doi = {10.3389/fninf.2013.00012},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/fninf-07-00012.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1662-5196},
journal = {Frontiers in neuroinformatics},
keywords = {classification,data sharing,informatics,informatics, data sharing, metadata, multivariate,,metadata,multivariate},
month = {jan},
number = {July},
pages = {12},
pmid = {23847528},
title = {{Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3703526{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {7},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Wager2007a,
abstract = {Meta-analysis is an increasingly popular and valuable tool for summarizing results across many neuroimaging studies. It can be used to establish consensus on the locations of functional regions, test hypotheses developed from patient and animal studies and develop new hypotheses on structure-function correspondence. It is particularly valuable in neuroimaging because most studies do not adequately correct for multiple comparisons; based on statistical thresholds used, we estimate that roughly 10-20{\%} of reported activations in published studies are false positives. In this article, we briefly summarize some of the most popular meta-analytic approaches and their limitations, and we outline a revised multilevel approach with increased validity for establishing consistency across studies. We also discuss multivariate methods by which meta-analysis can be used to develop and test hypotheses about co-activity of brain regions. Finally, we argue that meta-analyses can make a uniquely valuable contribution to predicting psychological states from patterns of brain activity, and we briefly discuss some methods for making such predictions.},
author = {Wager, Tor D and Lindquist, Martin and Kaplan, Lauren},
doi = {10.1093/scan/nsm015},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/150.full.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1749-5024},
journal = {Social cognitive and affective neuroscience},
keywords = {Forecasting,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: trends},
month = {jun},
number = {2},
pages = {150--8},
pmid = {18985131},
title = {{Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2555451{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {2},
year = {2007}
}
@article{Bennett1995,
author = {Bennett, Craig M and Baird, Abigail A and Miller, Michael B and Wolford, George L},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bennett et al. - 1995 - Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon An argument for multipl.pdf:pdf},
pages = {1995},
title = {{Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon : An argument for multiple comparisons correction}},
year = {1995}
}
@inproceedings{Bennett2009a,
author = {Bennett, Craig M and Baird, Abigail A and Miller, Michael B and Wolford, George L},
booktitle = {15th Annual meeting of the Organisation for Human Brain Mapping},
title = {{Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem atlantic salmon: an argument for proper multiple comparisons corrections.}},
year = {2009}
}
@article{Reiss2012,
author = {Reiss, Philip T and Schwartzman, Armin and Lu, Feihan and Huang, Lei and Proal, Erika},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.040},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Reiss et al. - 2012 - Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1053-8119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Adjusted p-values,Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder,Cortical thickness,False discovery rate,Multiple testing,q-values},
number = {4},
pages = {1833--1840},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.040},
volume = {63},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Friston2012,
abstract = {As an expert reviewer, it is sometimes necessary to ensure a paper is rejected. This can sometimes be achieved by highlighting improper statistical practice. This technical note provides guidance on how to critique the statistical analysis of neuroimaging studies to maximise the chance that the paper will be declined. We will review a series of critiques that can be applied universally to any neuroimaging paper and consider responses to potential rebuttals that reviewers might encounter from authors or editors.},
author = {Friston, Karl J},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Friston - 2012 - Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Neuroimaging,Peer Review,Research,Research Design,Research: methods,Statistics as Topic,Statistics as Topic: methods},
month = {jul},
number = {4},
pages = {1300--10},
pmid = {22521475},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22521475},
volume = {61},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Homola2012,
abstract = {Age is one of the most salient aspects in faces and of fundamental cognitive and social relevance. Although face processing has been studied extensively, brain regions responsive to age have yet to be localized. Using evocative face morphs and fMRI, we segregate two areas extending beyond the previously established face-sensitive core network, centered on the inferior temporal sulci and angular gyri bilaterally, both of which process changes of facial age. By means of probabilistic tractography, we compare their patterns of functional activation and structural connectivity. The ventral portion of Wernicke's understudied perpendicular association fasciculus is shown to interconnect the two areas, and activation within these clusters is related to the probability of fiber connectivity between them. In addition, post-hoc age-rating competence is found to be associated with high response magnitudes in the left angular gyrus. Our results provide the first evidence that facial age has a distinct representation pattern in the posterior human brain. We propose that particular face-sensitive nodes interact with additional object-unselective quantification modules to obtain individual estimates of facial age. This brain network processing the age of faces differs from the cortical areas that have previously been linked to less developmental but instantly changeable face aspects. Our probabilistic method of associating activations with connectivity patterns reveals an exemplary link that can be used to further study, assess and quantify structure-function relationships.},
author = {Homola, Gy{\"{o}}rgy a and Jbabdi, Saad and Beckmann, Christian F and Bartsch, Andreas Joachim},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0049451},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Homola et al. - 2012 - A brain network processing the age of faces.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1932-6203},
journal = {PloS one},
keywords = {Adult,Age Factors,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: pathology,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Face,Female,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Male,Pattern Recognition,Probability,Psychometrics,Sex Factors,Temporal Lobe,Temporal Lobe: pathology,Temporal Lobe: physiology,Visual,Visual: physiology},
month = {jan},
number = {11},
pages = {e49451},
pmid = {23185334},
title = {{A brain network processing the age of faces.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3502502{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {7},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Wasserman2004,
author = {Wasserman, Larry and Genovese, Christopher},
doi = {10.1214/009053604000000283},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wasserman, Genovese - 2004 - A stochastic process approach to false discovery control.pdf:pdf},
issn = {0090-5364},
journal = {The Annals of Statistics},
keywords = {and phrases,false discovery rate,multiple testing,p -values},
month = {jun},
number = {3},
pages = {1035--1061},
title = {{A stochastic process approach to false discovery control}},
url = {http://projecteuclid.org/Dienst/getRecord?id=euclid.aos/1085408494/},
volume = {32},
year = {2004}
}
@book{Poldrack2011,
author = {Poldrack, Russell and Mumford, Jeanette A and Nichols, Thomas E},
title = {{Handbook of functional MRI data analysis}},
year = {2011}
}
@article{VanEssen2012,
abstract = {The Human Connectome Project (HCP) is an ambitious 5-year effort to characterize brain connectivity and function and their variability in healthy adults. This review summarizes the data acquisition plans being implemented by a consortium of HCP investigators who will study a population of 1200 subjects (twins and their non-twin siblings) using multiple imaging modalities along with extensive behavioral and genetic data. The imaging modalities will include diffusion imaging (dMRI), resting-state fMRI (R-fMRI), task-evoked fMRI (T-fMRI), T1- and T2-weighted MRI for structural and myelin mapping, plus combined magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG). Given the importance of obtaining the best possible data quality, we discuss the efforts underway during the first two years of the grant (Phase I) to refine and optimize many aspects of HCP data acquisition, including a new 7T scanner, a customized 3T scanner, and improved MR pulse sequences.},
author = {{Van Essen}, D C and Ugurbil, K and Auerbach, E and Barch, Deanna M and Behrens, T E J and Bucholz, R and Chang, A and Chen, L and Corbetta, M and Curtiss, S W and {Della Penna}, S and Feinberg, D and Glasser, M F and Harel, N and Heath, a C and Larson-Prior, L and Marcus, D and Michalareas, G and Moeller, S and Oostenveld, R and Petersen, S E and Prior, F and Schlaggar, B L and Smith, Stephen M and Snyder, a Z and Xu, J and Yacoub, E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/1-s2.0-S1053811912001954-main.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: anatomy {\&} histology,Brain: physiology,Connectome,Connectome: methods,Humans},
month = {oct},
number = {4},
pages = {2222--31},
pmid = {22366334},
title = {{The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3606888{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {62},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Jenkinson2012,
abstract = {FSL (the FMRIB Software Library) is a comprehensive library of analysis tools for functional, structural and diffusion MRI brain imaging data, written mainly by members of the Analysis Group, FMRIB, Oxford. For this NeuroImage special issue on "20 years of fMRI" we have been asked to write about the history, developments and current status of FSL. We also include some descriptions of parts of FSL that are not well covered in the existing literature. We hope that some of this content might be of interest to users of FSL, and also maybe to new research groups considering creating, releasing and supporting new software packages for brain image analysis.},
author = {Jenkinson, Mark and Beckmann, Christian F and Behrens, Timothy E J and Woolrich, Mark W and Smith, Stephen M},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/1-s2.0-S1053811911010603-main.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {20th Century,21st Century,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: history,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: anatomy {\&} histology,Brain: physiology,Computer-Assisted,Computer-Assisted: history,Computer-Assisted: methods,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: history,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,History,Humans,Image Processing,Software,Software: history},
month = {aug},
number = {2},
pages = {782--90},
pmid = {21979382},
title = {{Fsl.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21979382},
volume = {62},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Durnez2015,
author = {Durnez, Joke and Degryse, J. (Ghent University)},
journal = {R-News},
title = {{NeuroPower}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Roels2014,
author = {Roels, S.P. and Bossier, H. and Loeys, T. and Moerkerke, B.},
doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.10.024},
file = {:Users/Joke/Downloads/1-s2.0-S0165027014003926-main.pdf:pdf},
issn = {01650270},
journal = {Journal of Neuroscience Methods},
month = {nov},
pages = {1--11},
publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},
title = {{Data-analytical stability of cluster-wise and peak-wise inference in fMRI data analysis}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165027014003926},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Woo2014,
abstract = {Cluster-extent based thresholding is currently the most popular method for multiple comparisons correction of statistical maps in neuroimaging studies, due to its high sensitivity to weak and diffuse signals. However, cluster-extent based thresholding provides low spatial specificity; researchers can only infer that there is signal somewhere within a significant cluster and cannot make inferences about the statistical significance of specific locations within the cluster. This poses a particular problem when one uses a liberal cluster-defining primary threshold (i.e., higher p-values), which often produces large clusters spanning multiple anatomical regions. In such cases, it is impossible to reliably infer which anatomical regions show true effects. From a survey of 814 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies published in 2010 and 2011, we show that the use of liberal primary thresholds (e.g., p{\textless}.01) is endemic, and that the largest determinant of the primary threshold level is the default option in the software used. We illustrate the problems with liberal primary thresholds using an fMRI dataset from our laboratory (N=33), and present simulations demonstrating the detrimental effects of liberal primary thresholds on false positives, localization, and interpretation of fMRI findings. To avoid these pitfalls, we recommend several analysis and reporting procedures, including 1) setting primary p{\textless}.001 as a default lower limit; 2) using more stringent primary thresholds or voxel-wise correction methods for highly powered studies; and 3) adopting reporting practices that make the level of spatial precision transparent to readers. We also suggest alternative and supplementary analysis methods.},
author = {Woo, Choong-Wan and Krishnan, Anjali and Wager, Tor D},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Woo, Krishnan, Wager - 2014 - Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses pitfalls and recommendations.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Cluster-extent thresholding,FSL,False discovery rate,Family-wise error rate,Gaussian random fields,Multiple comparisons,Primary threshold,SPM,cluster-extent thresholding,fMRI,multiple comparisons},
month = {may},
pages = {412--9},
pmid = {24412399},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412399},
volume = {91},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Kriegeskorte2010,
author = {Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus and Simmons, W Kyle and Bellgowan, Patrick S F and Baker, Chris I},
doi = {10.1038/nn.2303.Circular},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Kriegeskorte et al. - 2010 - Circular Analysis in systems neuroscience - the dangers of double dipping.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Nature Neuroscience},
number = {5},
pages = {535--540},
title = {{Circular Analysis in systems neuroscience - the dangers of double dipping}},
volume = {12},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Friston1999,
abstract = {This article considers the efficiency of event-related fMRI designs in terms of the optimum temporal pattern of stimulus or trial presentations. The distinction between "stochastic" and "deterministic" is used to distinguish between designs that are specified in terms of the probability that an event will occur at a series of time points (stochastic) and those in which events always occur at prespecified time (deterministic). Stochastic designs may be "stationary," in which the probability is constant, or nonstationary, in which the probabilities change with time. All these designs can be parameterized in terms of a vector of occurrence probabilities and a prototypic design matrix that embodies constraints (such as the minimum stimulus onset asynchrony) and the model of hemodynamic responses. A simple function of these parameters is presented and used to compare the relative efficiency of different designs. Designs with slow modulation of occurrence probabilities are generally more efficient than stationary designs. Interestingly the most efficient design is a conventional block design. A critical point, made in this article, is that the most efficient design for one effect may not be the most efficient for another. This is particularly important when considering evoked responses and the differences among responses. The most efficient designs for evoked responses, as opposed to differential responses, require trial-free periods during which baseline levels can be attained. In the context of stochastic, rapid-presentation designs this is equivalent to the inclusion of "null events."},
author = {Friston, Karl J and Zarahn, E and Josephs, O and Henson, R N and Dale, a M},
doi = {10.1006/nimg.1999.0498},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Friston et al. - 1999 - Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1053-8119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Arousal,Arousal: physiology,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain: blood supply,Evoked Potentials,Evoked Potentials: physiology,Hemodynamics,Hemodynamics: physiology,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: statistics {\&} numerical,Stochastic Processes},
month = {nov},
number = {5},
pages = {607--19},
pmid = {10547338},
title = {{Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547338},
volume = {10},
year = {1999}
}
@article{Durnez2013a,
abstract = {Functional magnetic reasonance imaging (fMRI) plays an important role in pre-surgical planning for patients with resectable brain lesions such as tumors. With appropriately designed tasks, the results of fMRI studies can guide resection, thereby preserving vital brain tissue. The mass univariate approach to fMRI data analysis consists of performing a statistical test in each voxel, which is used to classify voxels as either active or inactive-that is, related, or not, to the task of interest. In cognitive neuroscience, the focus is on controlling the rate of false positives while accounting for the severe multiple testing problem of searching the brain for activations. However, stringent control of false positives is accompanied by a risk of false negatives, which can be detrimental, particularly in clinical settings where false negatives may lead to surgical resection of vital brain tissue. Consequently, for clinical applications, we argue for a testing procedure with a stronger focus on preventing false negatives. We present a thresholding procedure that incorporates information on false positives and false negatives. We combine two measures of significance for each voxel: a classical p-value, which reflects evidence against the null hypothesis of no activation, and an alternative p-value, which reflects evidence against activation of a prespecified size. This results in a layered statistical map for the brain. One layer marks voxels exhibiting strong evidence against the traditional null hypothesis, while a second layer marks voxels where activation cannot be confidently excluded. The third layer marks voxels where the presence of activation can be rejected.},
author = {Durnez, Joke and Moerkerke, Beatrijs and Bartsch, Andreas Joachim and Nichols, Thomas E},
doi = {10.3758/s13415-013-0185-3},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Durnez et al. - 2013 - Alternative-based thresholding with application to presurgical fMRI.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1531-135X},
journal = {Cognitive, affective {\&} behavioral neuroscience},
keywords = {Algorithms,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain: blood supply,Brain: physiology,Brain: surgery,Computer-Assisted,Humans,Image Processing,Linear Models,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Oxygen,Oxygen: blood,Principal Component Analysis},
month = {dec},
number = {4},
pages = {703--13},
pmid = {23868644},
title = {{Alternative-based thresholding with application to presurgical fMRI.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868644},
volume = {13},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Wager2003,
author = {Wager, Tor D. and Nichols, Thomas E.},
doi = {10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00046-0},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wager, Nichols - 2003 - Optimization of experimental design in fMRI a general framework using a genetic algorithm.pdf:pdf},
issn = {10538119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {counterbalancing,efficiency,experimental design,fmri,genetic algorithm,neuroimaging methods,optimization},
month = {feb},
number = {2},
pages = {293--309},
title = {{Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811902000460},
volume = {18},
year = {2003}
}
@article{Friston1996,
abstract = {This paper is about detecting activations in statistical parametric maps and considers the relative sensitivity of a nested hierarchy of tests that we have framed in terms of the level of inference (voxel level, cluster level, and set level). These tests are based on the probability of obtaining c, or more, clusters with k, or more, voxels, above a threshold u. This probability has a reasonably simple form and is derived using distributional approximations from the theory of Gaussian fields. The most important contribution of this work is the notion of set-level inference. Set-level inference refers to the statistical inference that the number of clusters comprising an observed activation profile is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This inference pertains to the set of activations reaching criteria and represents a new way of assigning P values to distributed effects. Cluster-level inferences are a special case of set-level inferences, which obtain when the number of clusters c = 1. Similarly voxel-level inferences are special cases of cluster-level inferences that result when the cluster can be very small (i.e., k = 0). Using a theoretical power analysis of distributed activations, we observed that set-level inferences are generally more powerful than cluster-level inferences and that cluster-level inferences are generally more powerful than voxel-level inferences. The price paid for this increased sensitivity is reduced localizing power: Voxel-level tests permit individual voxels to be identified as significant, whereas cluster-and set-level inferences only allow clusters or sets of clusters to be so identified. For all levels of inference the spatial size of the underlying signal f (relative to resolution) determines the most powerful thresholds to adopt. For set-level inferences if f is large (e.g., fMRI) then the optimum extent threshold should be greater than the expected number of voxels for each cluster. If f is small (e.g., PET) the extent threshold should be small. We envisage that set-level inferences will find a role in making statistical inferences about distributed activations, particularly in fMRI.},
author = {Friston, Karl J and Holmes, A and Poline, J B and Price, C J and Frith, C D},
doi = {10.1006/nimg.1996.0074},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Friston et al. - 1996 - Detecting activations in PET and fMRI levels of inference and power.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1053-8119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain: physiology,Data Interpretation,Emission-Computed,Emission-Computed: statistics {\&} numeri,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: statistics {\&} numerical,Mathematical Computing,Normal Distribution,Probability,ROC Curve,Sensitivity and Specificity,Statistical,Tomography},
month = {dec},
number = {3 Pt 1},
pages = {223--35},
pmid = {9345513},
title = {{Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9345513},
volume = {4},
year = {1996}
}
@article{Seurinck2011,
abstract = {A growing number of studies show that visual mental imagery recruits the same brain areas as visual perception. Although the necessity of hV5/MT+ for motion perception has been revealed by means of TMS, its relevance for motion imagery remains unclear. We induced a direction-selective adaptation in hV5/MT+ by means of an MAE while subjects performed a mental rotation task that elicits imagined motion. We concurrently measured behavioral performance and neural activity with fMRI, enabling us to directly assess the effect of a perturbation of hV5/MT+ on other cortical areas involved in the mental rotation task. The activity in hV5/MT+ increased as more mental rotation was required, and the perturbation of hV5/MT+ affected behavioral performance as well as the neural activity in this area. Moreover, several regions in the posterior parietal cortex were also affected by this perturbation. Our results show that hV5/MT+ is required for imagined visual motion and engages in an interaction with parietal cortex during this cognitive process.},
author = {Seurinck, Ruth and de Lange, Floris P and Achten, Erik and Vingerhoets, Guy},
doi = {10.1162/jocn.2010.21525},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Seurinck et al. - 2011 - Mental rotation meets the motion aftereffect the role of hV5MT in visual mental imagery.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1530-8898},
journal = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},
keywords = {Adult,Humans,Imagination,Imagination: physiology,Male,Mental Processes,Mental Processes: physiology,Motion Perception,Motion Perception: physiology,Photic Stimulation,Photic Stimulation: methods,Psychomotor Performance,Psychomotor Performance: physiology,Rotation,Visual Cortex,Visual Cortex: physiology,Young Adult},
month = {jun},
number = {6},
pages = {1395--404},
pmid = {20521853},
title = {{Mental rotation meets the motion aftereffect: the role of hV5/MT+ in visual mental imagery.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20521853},
volume = {23},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Durnez2013,
abstract = {Functional magnetic reasonance imaging (fMRI) plays an important role in pre-surgical planning for patients with resectable brain lesions such as tumors. With appropriately designed tasks, the results of fMRI studies can guide resection, thereby preserving vital brain tissue. The mass univariate approach to fMRI data analysis consists of performing a statistical test in each voxel, which is used to classify voxels as either active or inactive-that is, related, or not, to the task of interest. In cognitive neuroscience, the focus is on controlling the rate of false positives while accounting for the severe multiple testing problem of searching the brain for activations. However, stringent control of false positives is accompanied by a risk of false negatives, which can be detrimental, particularly in clinical settings where false negatives may lead to surgical resection of vital brain tissue. Consequently, for clinical applications, we argue for a testing procedure with a stronger focus on preventing false negatives. We present a thresholding procedure that incorporates information on false positives and false negatives. We combine two measures of significance for each voxel: a classical p-value, which reflects evidence against the null hypothesis of no activation, and an alternative p-value, which reflects evidence against activation of a prespecified size. This results in a layered statistical map for the brain. One layer marks voxels exhibiting strong evidence against the traditional null hypothesis, while a second layer marks voxels where activation cannot be confidently excluded. The third layer marks voxels where the presence of activation can be rejected.},
author = {Durnez, Joke and Moerkerke, Beatrijs and Bartsch, Andreas Joachim and Nichols, Thomas E},
doi = {10.3758/s13415-013-0185-3},
file = {:Users/Joke/Dropbox/doctoraat{\_}Joke/Studie{\_}3{\_}presurgical/inpress.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1531-135X},
journal = {Cognitive, affective {\&} behavioral neuroscience},
keywords = {false negative errors,fmri,multiple,power,pre-surgical fmri,testing},
month = {dec},
number = {4},
pages = {703--13},
pmid = {23868644},
title = {{Alternative-based thresholding with application to presurgical fMRI.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868644},
volume = {13},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Durnez2014,
abstract = {When analyzing functional MRI data, several thresholding procedures are available to account for the huge number of volume units or features that are tested simultaneously. The main focus of these methods is to prevent an inflation of false positives. However, this comes with a serious decrease in power and leads to a problematic imbalance between type I and type II errors. In this paper, we show how estimating the number of activated peaks or clusters enables one to estimate post-hoc how powerful the selection procedure performs. This procedure can be used in real studies as a diagnostics tool, and raises awareness on how much activation is potentially missed. The method is evaluated and illustrated using simulations and a real data example. Our real data example illustrates the lack of power in current fMRI research.},
author = {Durnez, Joke and Moerkerke, Beatrijs and Nichols, Thomas E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.072},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Durnez, Moerkerke, Nichols - 2014 - Post-hoc power estimation for topological inference in fMRI.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {False negative errors,Multiple testing,Power,Random field theory,fMRI},
month = {jan},
pages = {45--64},
pmid = {23927901},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Post-hoc power estimation for topological inference in fMRI.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927901},
volume = {84},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Durnez2014a,
abstract = {Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a widespread technique in cognitive psychology that allows visualizing brain activation. The data analysis encompasses an enormous number of simultaneous statistical tests. Procedures that either control the familywise error rate or the false discovery rate have been applied to these data. These methods are mostly validated in terms of average sensitivity and specificity. However, procedures are not comparable if requirements on their error rates differ. Moreover, less attention has been given to the instability or variability of results. In a simulation study in the context of imaging, we first compare the Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg procedures. Considering Bonferroni as a way to control the expected number of type I errors enables more lenient thresholding compared to familywise error rate control and a direct comparison between both procedures. We point out that while the same balance is obtained between average sensitivity and specificity, the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure appears less stable. Secondly, we have implemented the procedure of Gordon et al. () (originally proposed for gene selection) that includes stability, measured through bootstrapping, in the decision criterion. Simulations indicate that the method attains the same balance between sensitivity and specificity. It improves the stability of Benjamini-Hochberg but does not outperform Bonferroni, making this computationally heavy bootstrap procedure less appealing. Third, we show how stability of thresholding procedures can be assessed using real data. In a dataset on face recognition, we again find that Bonferroni renders more stable results.},
author = {Durnez, Joke and Roels, Sanne P and Moerkerke, Beatrijs},
doi = {10.1002/bimj.201200056},
file = {:Users/Joke/Dropbox/doctoraat{\_}Joke/Studie{\_}1{\_}stability/gepubliceerd.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1521-4036},
journal = {Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift},
keywords = {additional supporting information may,article,at the publisher,be found in the,fmri,multiple testing,neuroimaging,online version of this,s web-site,sensitivity,stability},
month = {may},
pages = {1--13},
pmid = {24804953},
title = {{Multiple testing in fMRI: An empirical case study on the balance between sensitivity, specificity, and stability.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24804953},
volume = {00},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Mikl2008,
abstract = {The analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data involves multiple stages of data pre-processing before the activation can be statistically detected. Spatial smoothing is a very common pre-processing step in the analysis of functional brain imaging data. This study presents a broad perspective on the influence of spatial smoothing on fMRI group activation results. The data obtained from 20 volunteers during a visual oddball task were used for this study. Spatial smoothing using an isotropic gaussian filter kernel with full width at half maximum (FWHM) sizes 2 to 30 mm with a step of 2 mm was applied in two levels - smoothing of fMRI data and/or smoothing of single-subject contrast files prior to general linear model random-effects group analysis generating statistical parametric maps. Five regions of interest were defined, and several parameters (coordinates of nearest local maxima, t value, corrected threshold, effect size, residual values, etc.) were evaluated to examine the effects of spatial smoothing. The optimal filter size for group analysis is discussed according to various criteria. For our experiment, the optimal FWHM is about 8 mm. We can conclude that for robust experiments and an adequate number of subjects in the study, the optimal FWHM for single-subject inference is similar to that for group inference (about 8 mm, according to spatial resolution). For less robust experiments and fewer subjects in the study, a higher FWHM would be optimal for group inference than for single-subject inferences.},
author = {Mikl, Michal and Marecek, Radek and Hlust{\'{i}}k, Petr and Pavlicov{\'{a}}, Martina and Drastich, Ales and Chlebus, Pavel and Br{\'{a}}zdil, Milan and Krupa, Petr},
doi = {10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.006},
issn = {0730-725X},
journal = {Magnetic resonance imaging},
keywords = {Adult,Algorithms,Artifacts,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: instrumentation,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: pathology,Contrast Media,Equipment Design,Female,Humans,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Male,Models, Statistical,Normal Distribution,Reproducibility of Results},
month = {may},
number = {4},
pages = {490--503},
pmid = {18060720},
title = {{Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences.}},
volume = {26},
year = {2008}
}
@misc{TheMendeleySupportTeam2011b,
abstract = {A quick introduction to Mendeley. Learn how Mendeley creates your personal digital library, how to organize and annotate documents, how to collaborate and share with colleagues, and how to generate citations and bibliographies.},
address = {London},
author = {{The Mendeley Support Team}},
booktitle = {Mendeley Desktop},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/The Mendeley Support Team - 2011 - Getting Started with Mendeley.pdf:pdf},
keywords = {Mendeley,how-to,user manual},
pages = {1--16},
publisher = {Mendeley Ltd.},
title = {{Getting Started with Mendeley}},
url = {http://www.mendeley.com},
year = {2011}
}
@misc{TheMendeleySupportTeam2011c,
abstract = {A quick introduction to Mendeley. Learn how Mendeley creates your personal digital library, how to organize and annotate documents, how to collaborate and share with colleagues, and how to generate citations and bibliographies.},
address = {London},
author = {{The Mendeley Support Team}},
booktitle = {Mendeley Desktop},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/The Mendeley Support Team - 2011 - Getting Started with Mendeley.pdf:pdf},
keywords = {Mendeley,how-to,user manual},
pages = {1--16},
publisher = {Mendeley Ltd.},
title = {{Getting Started with Mendeley}},
url = {http://www.mendeley.com},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Holm1979,
author = {Holm, Sture},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Holm - 1979 - A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Statistics},
keywords = {exact definition,multiple test,simultaneous test,the methodological motivation and},
number = {2},
pages = {65--70},
title = {{A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure}},
volume = {6},
year = {1979}
}
@article{Quinlan2013,
author = {Quinlan, Philip T},
doi = {10.1038/nrn3475},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Quinlan - 2013 - Misuse of power in defence of small-scale science.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Nature reviews. Neuroscience},
pages = {2013},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
title = {{Misuse of power : in defence of small-scale science}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475-c1},
volume = {237},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Mumford2012,
abstract = {In the past, power analyses were not that common for fMRI studies, but recent advances in power calculation techniques and software development are making power analyses much more accessible. As a result, power analyses are more commonly expected in grant applications proposing fMRI studies. Even though the software is somewhat automated, there are important decisions to be made when setting up and carrying out a power analysis. This guide provides tips on carrying out power analyses, including obtaining pilot data, defining a region of interest and other choices to help create reliable power calculations.},
author = {Mumford, Jeanette A},
doi = {10.1093/scan/nss059},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Mumford - 2012 - A power calculation guide for fMRI studies.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1749-5024},
journal = {Social cognitive and affective neuroscience},
keywords = {Algorithms,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: blood supply,Brain: physiology,Computer-Assisted,Humans,Image Processing,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Oxygen,Oxygen: blood},
month = {aug},
number = {6},
pages = {738--42},
pmid = {22641837},
title = {{A power calculation guide for fMRI studies.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3427872{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {7},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Ashton2013,
author = {Ashton, John C},
doi = {10.1038/nrn3475},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Ashton - 2013 - Experimental power comes from powerful theories — the real problem in null hypothesis testing.pdf:pdf},
journal = {nature},
pages = {2013},
title = {{Experimental power comes from powerful theories — the real problem in null hypothesis testing}},
volume = {834},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Mumford2009,
abstract = {While many advanced mixed-effects models have been proposed and are used in fMRI, the simplest, ordinary least squares (OLS), is still the one that is most widely used. A survey of 90 papers found that 92{\%} of group fMRI analyses used OLS. Despite the widespread use, this simple approach has never been thoroughly justified and evaluated; for example, the typical reference for the method is a conference abstract, (Holmes, A., Friston, K., 1998. Generalisability, random effects {\&} population inference. NeuroImage 7 (4 (2/3)), S754, proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 7-12, 1998, Montreal, Canada.), which has been referenced over 400 times. In this work we fully derive the simplified method in a general setting and carefully identify the homogeneity assumptions it is based on. We examine the specificity (Type I error rate) of the OLS method under heterogeneity in the one-sample case and find that the OLS method is valid, with only slight conservativeness. Surprisingly, a Satterthwaite approximation for effective degrees of freedom only makes the method more conservative, instead of more accurate. While other authors have highlighted the inferior power of the OLS method relative to optimal mixed-effects methods under heterogeneity, we revisit these results and find the power differences very modest. While statistical methods that make the best use of the data are always to be preferred, software or other practical concerns may require the use of the simple OLS group modeling. In such cases, we find that group mean inferences will be valid under the null hypothesis and will have nearly optimal sensitivity under the alternative.},
author = {Mumford, Jeanette A and Nichols, Thomas},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.034},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Mumford, Nichols - 2009 - Simple group fMRI modeling and inference.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Adult,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Computer Simulation,Computer-Assisted,Computer-Assisted: methods,Evoked Potentials,Female,Humans,Image Enhancement,Image Enhancement: methods,Image Interpretation,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Male,Models,Motor,Motor Cortex,Motor Cortex: physiology,Motor: physiology,Movement,Movement: physiology,Neurological,Reproducibility of Results,Sensitivity and Specificity},
month = {oct},
number = {4},
pages = {1469--75},
pmid = {19463958},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Simple group fMRI modeling and inference.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2719771{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {47},
year = {2009}
}
@article{Bacchetti2013,
author = {Bacchetti, Peter},
doi = {10.1038/nrn3475},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bacchetti - 2013 - Small sample size is not the real problem.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Nature reviews. Neuroscience},
pages = {2013},
title = {{Small sample size is not the real problem}},
volume = {24},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Button2013a,
abstract = {A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant result reflects a true effect. Here, we show that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low. The consequences of this include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results. There are also ethical dimensions to this problem, as unreliable research is inefficient and wasteful. Improving reproducibility in neuroscience is a key priority and requires attention to well-established but often ignored methodological principles.},
author = {Button, Katherine S and Ioannidis, John P a and Mokrysz, Claire and Nosek, Brian a and Flint, Jonathan and Robinson, Emma S J and Munaf{\`{o}}, Marcus R},
doi = {10.1038/nrn3475},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Button et al. - 2013 - Power failure why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience(2).pdf:pdf},
issn = {1471-0048},
journal = {Nature reviews. Neuroscience},
keywords = {Humans,Neurosciences,Probability,Reproducibility of Results,Sample Size},
month = {may},
number = {5},
pages = {365--76},
pmid = {23571845},
title = {{Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571845},
volume = {14},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Vul2009a,
author = {Vul, Edward and Harris, Christine and Winkielman, Piotr and Pashler, Harold},
doi = {10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01132.x},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Vul et al. - 2009 - Reply to Comments on “Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.pdf:pdf},
issn = {17456916},
journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
month = {may},
number = {3},
pages = {319--324},
title = {{Reply to Comments on “Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition”}},
url = {http://pps.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01132.x},
volume = {4},
year = {2009}
}
@article{Wacholder2004,
author = {Wacholder, S. and Chanock, S. and Garcia-Closas, M. and El ghormli, L. and Rothman, N.},
doi = {10.1093/jnci/djh075},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wacholder et al. - 2004 - Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies.pdf:pdf},
issn = {0027-8874},
journal = {JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute},
month = {mar},
number = {6},
pages = {434--442},
title = {{Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies}},
url = {http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/jnci/djh075},
volume = {96},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Joyce2012,
abstract = {Although there are a number of statistical software tools for voxel-based massively univariate analysis of neuroimaging data, such as fMRI (functional MRI), PET (positron emission tomography), and VBM (voxel-based morphometry), very few software tools exist for power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies. Unlike typical biomedical studies, outcomes from neuroimaging studies are 3D images of correlated voxels, requiring a correction for massive multiple comparisons. Thus, a specialized power calculation tool is needed for planning neuroimaging studies. To facilitate this process, we developed a software tool specifically designed for neuroimaging data. The software tool, called PowerMap, implements theoretical power calculation algorithms based on non-central random field theory. It can also calculate power for statistical analyses with FDR (false discovery rate) corrections. This GUI (graphical user interface)-based tool enables neuroimaging researchers without advanced knowledge in imaging statistics to calculate power and sample size in the form of 3D images. In this paper, we provide an overview of the statistical framework behind the PowerMap tool. Three worked examples are also provided, a regression analysis, an ANOVA (analysis of variance), and a two-sample T-test, in order to demonstrate the study planning process with PowerMap. We envision that PowerMap will be a great aide for future neuroimaging research.},
author = {Joyce, Karen E and Hayasaka, Satoru},
doi = {10.1007/s12021-012-9152-3},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Joyce, Hayasaka - 2012 - Development of PowerMap a software package for statistical power calculation in neuroimaging studies.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1202101291},
issn = {1559-0089},
journal = {Neuroinformatics},
keywords = {Adolescent,Adult,Aged,Algorithms,Analysis of Variance,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain: anatomy {\&} histology,Brain: blood supply,Female,Humans,Imaging, Three-Dimensional,Imaging, Three-Dimensional: methods,Male,Middle Aged,Neuroimaging,Neuroimaging: methods,Regression Analysis,Software,Young Adult},
month = {oct},
number = {4},
pages = {351--65},
pmid = {22644868},
title = {{Development of PowerMap: a software package for statistical power calculation in neuroimaging studies.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644868},
volume = {10},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Chang2011,
abstract = {Sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia patients has been well-documented. However, a central conceptual issue, regarding whether the gating deficit results from an abnormal initial response (S1) or difficulty in attenuating the response to the repeating stimulus (S2), raise doubts about the validity and utility of the S2/S1 ratio as a measure of sensory gating. This meta-analysis study, therefore, sought to determine the consistency and relative magnitude of the effect of the two essential components (S1 and S2) and the ratio. The results of weighted random effects meta-analysis revealed that the overall effect sizes for the S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and P50 S2/S1 ratio were -0.19 (small), 0.65 (medium to large), and 0.93 (large), respectively. These results confirm that the S2/S1 ratio and the repeating (S2) stimulus differ robustly between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls in contrast to the consistent but smaller effect size for the S1 amplitude. These findings are more likely to reflect defective inhibition of repeating redundant input rather than an abnormal response to novel stimuli.},
author = {Chang, Wen-Pin and Arfken, Cynthia L and Sangal, Monica P and Boutros, Nash N},
doi = {10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01168.x},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Chang et al. - 2011 - Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices a meta-analysis.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1540-5958},
journal = {Psychophysiology},
keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation,Brain,Brain: physiopathology,Electroencephalography,Evoked Potentials, Auditory,Evoked Potentials, Auditory: physiology,Humans,Reaction Time,Reaction Time: physiology,Schizophrenia,Schizophrenia: physiopathology,Sensory Gating,Sensory Gating: physiology},
month = {jul},
number = {7},
pages = {980--92},
pmid = {21214588},
title = {{Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices: a meta-analysis.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21214588},
volume = {48},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Mumford2008a,
abstract = {When planning most scientific studies, one of the first steps is to carry out a power analysis to define a design and sample size that will result in a well-powered study. There are limited resources for calculating power for group fMRI studies due to the complexity of the model. Previous approaches for group fMRI power calculation simplify the study design and/or the variance structure in order to make the calculation possible. These approaches limit the designs that can be studied and may result in inaccurate power calculations. We introduce a flexible power calculation model that makes fewer simplifying assumptions, leading to a more accurate power analysis that can be used on a wide variety of study designs. Our power calculation model can be used to obtain region of interest (ROI) summaries of the mean parameters and variance parameters, which can be use to increase understanding of the data as well as calculate power for a future study. Our example illustrates that minimizing cost to achieve 80{\%} power is not as simple as finding the smallest sample size capable of achieving 80{\%} power, since smaller sample sizes require each subject to be scanned longer.},
author = {Mumford, Jeanette A and Nichols, Thomas E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.061},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Mumford, Nichols - 2008 - Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation(2).pdf:pdf},
issn = {1053-8119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Adult,Algorithms,Auditory,Auditory: physiology,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Computer Simulation,Computer-Assisted,Computer-Assisted: methods,Evoked Potentials,Female,Humans,Image Enhancement,Image Enhancement: methods,Image Interpretation,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Male,Models,Neurological,Reproducibility of Results,Sensitivity and Specificity,Speech Perception,Speech Perception: physiology,Statistics as Topic},
month = {jan},
number = {1},
pages = {261--8},
pmid = {17919925},
title = {{Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2423281{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {39},
year = {2008}
}
@article{Maus2011,
abstract = {The design of a multi-subject fMRI experiment needs specification of the number of subjects and scanning time per subject. For example, for a blocked design with conditions A or B, fixed block length and block order ABN, where N denotes a null block, the optimal number of cycles of ABN and the optimal number of subjects have to be determined. This paper presents a method to determine the optimal number of subjects and optimal number of cycles for a blocked design based on the A-optimality criterion and a linear cost function by which the number of cycles and the number of subjects are restricted. Estimation of individual stimulus effects and estimation of contrasts between stimulus effects are both considered. The mixed-effects model is applied and analytical results for the A-optimal number of subjects and A-optimal number of cycles are obtained under the assumption of uncorrelated errors. For correlated errors with a first-order autoregressive (AR1) error structure, numerical results are presented. Our results show how the optimal number of cycles and subjects depend on the within- to between-subject variance ratio. Our method is a new approach to determine the optimal scanning time and optimal number of subjects for a multi-subject fMRI experiment. In contrast to previous results based on power analyses, the optimal number of cycles and subjects can be described analytically and costs are considered.},
author = {Maus, B{\"{a}}rbel and van Breukelen, Gerard J P and Goebel, Rainer and Berger, Martijn P F},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.019},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Maus et al. - 2011 - Optimal design of multi-subject blocked fMRI experiments.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Algorithms,Budgets,Data Interpretation, Statistical,Hemodynamics,Hemodynamics: physiology,Humans,Least-Squares Analysis,Linear Models,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: economics,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: statistics {\&} numerical,Research,Research Design,Research: economics,Sample Size},
month = {jun},
number = {3},
pages = {1338--52},
pmid = {21406234},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Optimal design of multi-subject blocked fMRI experiments.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406234},
volume = {56},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Carp2012,
abstract = {Replication of research findings is critical to the progress of scientific understanding. Accordingly, most scientific journals require authors to report experimental procedures in sufficient detail for independent researchers to replicate their work. To what extent do research reports in the functional neuroimaging literature live up to this standard? The present study evaluated methods reporting and methodological choices across 241 recent fMRI articles. Many studies did not report critical methodological details with regard to experimental design, data acquisition, and analysis. Further, many studies were underpowered to detect any but the largest statistical effects. Finally, data collection and analysis methods were highly flexible across studies, with nearly as many unique analysis pipelines as there were studies in the sample. Because the rate of false positive results is thought to increase with the flexibility of experimental designs, the field of functional neuroimaging may be particularly vulnerable to false positives. In sum, the present study documented significant gaps in methods reporting among fMRI studies. Improved methodological descriptions in research reports would yield significant benefits for the field.},
author = {Carp, Joshua},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Carp - 2012 - The secret lives of experiments methods reporting in the fMRI literature.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Biomedical Research,Biomedical Research: statistics {\&} numerical data,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: statistics {\&} numerical data,Humans,Literature Based Discovery,Literature Based Discovery: methods,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: statistics {\&} numerical,Periodicals as Topic,Periodicals as Topic: statistics {\&} numerical data,Reproducibility of Results,Sensitivity and Specificity},
month = {oct},
number = {1},
pages = {289--300},
pmid = {22796459},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796459},
volume = {63},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Ingre2013,
abstract = {It is sometimes argued that small studies provide better evidence for reported effects because they are less likely to report findings with small and trivial effect sizes (Friston, 2012). But larger studies are actually better at protecting against inferences from trivial effect sizes, if researchers just make use of effect sizes and confidence intervals. Poor statistical power also comes at a cost of inflated proportion of false positive findings, less power to "confirm" true effects and bias in reported (inflated) effect sizes. Small studies (n=16) lack the precision to reliably distinguish small and medium to large effect sizes (r{\textless}.50) from random noise ($\alpha$=.05) that larger studies (n=100) does with high level of confidence (r=.50, p=.00000012). The present paper presents the arguments needed for researchers to refute the claim that small low-powered studies have a higher degree of scientific evidence than large high-powered studies.},
author = {Ingre, Michael},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.030},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Ingre - 2013 - Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against trivial findings(2012).pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {False positive findings,Inflated effect sizes,Statistical power},
month = {nov},
pages = {496--8},
pmid = {23583358},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012).}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23583358},
volume = {81},
year = {2013}
}
@article{,
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Unknown - Unknown - Afdeling Studentenadministratie en studieprogramma ' s Registratie werkstudent.pdf:pdf},
pages = {9000},
title = {{Afdeling Studentenadministratie en studieprogramma ' s Registratie werkstudent}},
volume = {33}
}
@article{Button2013,
abstract = {A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant result reflects a true effect. Here, we show that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low. The consequences of this include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results. There are also ethical dimensions to this problem, as unreliable research is inefficient and wasteful. Improving reproducibility in neuroscience is a key priority and requires attention to well-established but often ignored methodological principles.},
author = {Button, Katherine S and Ioannidis, John P a and Mokrysz, Claire and Nosek, Brian a and Flint, Jonathan and Robinson, Emma S J and Munaf{\`{o}}, Marcus R},
doi = {10.1038/nrn3475},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Button et al. - 2013 - Power failure why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1471-0048},
journal = {Nature reviews. Neuroscience},
month = {may},
number = {5},
pages = {365--76},
pmid = {23571845},
title = {{Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571845},
volume = {14},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Friman2003,
author = {Friman, Ola and Borga, Magnus and Lundberg, Peter and Knutsson, Hans},
doi = {10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00077-6},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Friman et al. - 2003 - Adaptive analysis of fMRI data.pdf:pdf},
issn = {10538119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
month = {jul},
number = {3},
pages = {837--845},
title = {{Adaptive analysis of fMRI data}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811903000776},
volume = {19},
year = {2003}
}
@article{Dwass1957,
author = {Dwass, M.},
journal = {Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
pages = {181--187},
title = {{Modified randomization tests for nonparametric hypotheses.}},
volume = {28},
year = {1957}
}
@article{Bullmore1996,
abstract = {Two questions arising in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired during periodic sensory stimulation are: i) how to measure the experimentally determined effect in fMRI time series; and ii) how to decide whether an apparent effect is significant. Our approach is first to fit a time series regression model, including sine and cosine terms at the (fundamental) frequency of experimental stimulation, by pseudogeneralized least squares (PGLS) at each pixel of an image. Sinusoidal modeling takes account of locally variable hemodynamic delay and dispersion, and PGLS fitting corrects for residual or endogenous autocorrelation in fMRI time series, to yield best unbiased estimates of the amplitudes of the sine and cosine terms at fundamental frequency; from these parameters the authors derive estimates of experimentally determined power and its standard error. Randomization testing is then used to create inferential brain activation maps (BAMs) of pixels significantly activated by the experimental stimulus. The methods are illustrated by application to data acquired from normal human subjects during periodic visual and auditory stimulation.},
author = {Bullmore, E and Brammer, M and Williams, S C and Rabe-Hesketh, S and Janot, N and David, a and Mellers, J and Howard, R and Sham, P},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bullmore et al. - 1996 - Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis.pdf:pdf},
issn = {0740-3194},
journal = {Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain: physiology,Echo-Planar Imaging,Echo-Planar Imaging: methods,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Photic Stimulation,Regression Analysis,Sensitivity and Specificity},
month = {feb},
number = {2},
pages = {261--77},
pmid = {8622592},
title = {{Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8622592},
volume = {35},
year = {1996}
}
@misc{,
title = {{Bullmore et al. 1996pdf.PDF}}
}
@misc{TheMendeleySupportTeam2011a,
abstract = {A quick introduction to Mendeley. Learn how Mendeley creates your personal digital library, how to organize and annotate documents, how to collaborate and share with colleagues, and how to generate citations and bibliographies.},
address = {London},
author = {{The Mendeley Support Team}},
booktitle = {Mendeley Desktop},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/The Mendeley Support Team - 2011 - Getting Started with Mendeley.pdf:pdf},
keywords = {Mendeley,how-to,user manual},
pages = {1--16},
publisher = {Mendeley Ltd.},
title = {{Getting Started with Mendeley}},
url = {http://www.mendeley.com},
year = {2011}
}
@phdthesis{Holmes1995,
author = {Holmes, Andrew P},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Holmes - 1995 - Statistical Issues in functional brain mapping.pdf:pdf},
school = {Unversity of Glasgow},
title = {{Statistical Issues in functional brain mapping}},
year = {1995}
}
@article{Biswal2010,
abstract = {Although it is being successfully implemented for exploration of the genome, discovery science has eluded the functional neuroimaging community. The core challenge remains the development of common paradigms for interrogating the myriad functional systems in the brain without the constraints of a priori hypotheses. Resting-state functional MRI (R-fMRI) constitutes a candidate approach capable of addressing this challenge. Imaging the brain during rest reveals large-amplitude spontaneous low-frequency ({\textless}0.1 Hz) fluctuations in the fMRI signal that are temporally correlated across functionally related areas. Referred to as functional connectivity, these correlations yield detailed maps of complex neural systems, collectively constituting an individual's "functional connectome." Reproducibility across datasets and individuals suggests the functional connectome has a common architecture, yet each individual's functional connectome exhibits unique features, with stable, meaningful interindividual differences in connectivity patterns and strengths. Comprehensive mapping of the functional connectome, and its subsequent exploitation to discern genetic influences and brain-behavior relationships, will require multicenter collaborative datasets. Here we initiate this endeavor by gathering R-fMRI data from 1,414 volunteers collected independently at 35 international centers. We demonstrate a universal architecture of positive and negative functional connections, as well as consistent loci of inter-individual variability. Age and sex emerged as significant determinants. These results demonstrate that independent R-fMRI datasets can be aggregated and shared. High-throughput R-fMRI can provide quantitative phenotypes for molecular genetic studies and biomarkers of developmental and pathological processes in the brain. To initiate discovery science of brain function, the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project dataset is freely accessible at www.nitrc.org/projects/fcon{\_}1000/.},
author = {Biswal, Bharat B and Mennes, Maarten and Zuo, Xi-Nian and Gohel, Suril and Kelly, Clare and Smith, Stephen M and Beckmann, Christian F and Adelstein, Jonathan S and Buckner, Randy L and Colcombe, Stan and Dogonowski, Anne-Marie and Ernst, Monique and Fair, Damien and Hampson, Michelle and Hoptman, Matthew J and Hyde, James S and Kiviniemi, Vesa J and K{\"{o}}tter, Rolf and Li, Shi-Jiang and Lin, Ching-Po and Lowe, Mark J and Mackay, Clare and Madden, David J and Madsen, Kristoffer H and Margulies, Daniel S and Mayberg, Helen S and McMahon, Katie and Monk, Christopher S and Mostofsky, Stewart H and Nagel, Bonnie J and Pekar, James J and Peltier, Scott J and Petersen, Steven E and Riedl, Valentin and Rombouts, Serge a R B and Rypma, Bart and Schlaggar, Bradley L and Schmidt, Sein and Seidler, Rachael D and Siegle, Greg J and Sorg, Christian and Teng, Gao-Jun and Veijola, Juha and Villringer, Arno and Walter, Martin and Wang, Lihong and Weng, Xu-Chu and Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan and Williamson, Peter and Windischberger, Christian and Zang, Yu-Feng and Zhang, Hong-Ying and Castellanos, F Xavier and Milham, Michael P},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.0911855107},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Biswal et al. - 2010 - Toward discovery science of human brain function.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1091-6490},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
keywords = {Adolescent,Adult,Age Factors,Aged,Algorithms,Analysis of Variance,Brain,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Brain: anatomy {\&} histology,Brain: physiology,Female,Humans,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods,Male,Middle Aged,Neural Pathways,Neural Pathways: anatomy {\&} histology,Neural Pathways: physiology,Sex Factors,Young Adult},
month = {mar},
number = {10},
pages = {4734--9},
pmid = {20176931},
title = {{Toward discovery science of human brain function.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2842060{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {107},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Adler2010,
author = {Adler, Robert J. and Bobrowski, Omer and Borman, Matthew S},
doi = {10.1214/10-IMSCOLL609},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Adler, Bobrowski, Borman - 2010 - Persistent homology for random fields and complexes.pdf:pdf},
journal = {IMS Collections. Borrowing SStrength: Theory Powering Applications - A Festschrift for Lawrence D. Brown},
pages = {124--143},
title = {{Persistent homology for random fields and complexes}},
volume = {6},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Eklund2011,
abstract = {Parametric statistical methods, such as Z-, t-, and F-values, are traditionally employed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for identifying areas in the brain that are active with a certain degree of statistical significance. These parametric methods, however, have two major drawbacks. First, it is assumed that the observed data are Gaussian distributed and independent; assumptions that generally are not valid for fMRI data. Second, the statistical test distribution can be derived theoretically only for very simple linear detection statistics. With nonparametric statistical methods, the two limitations described above can be overcome. The major drawback of non-parametric methods is the computational burden with processing times ranging from hours to days, which so far have made them impractical for routine use in single-subject fMRI analysis. In this work, it is shown how the computational power of cost-efficient graphics processing units (GPUs) can be used to speed up random permutation tests. A test with 10000 permutations takes less than a minute, making statistical analysis of advanced detection methods in fMRI practically feasible. To exemplify the permutation-based approach, brain activity maps generated by the general linear model (GLM) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) are compared at the same significance level.},
author = {Eklund, Anders and Andersson, Mats and Knutsson, Hans},
doi = {10.1155/2011/627947},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Eklund, Andersson, Knutsson - 2011 - Fast random permutation tests enable objective evaluation of methods for single-subject FMRI analys.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1687-4196},
journal = {International journal of biomedical imaging},
month = {jan},
pages = {627947},
pmid = {22046176},
title = {{Fast random permutation tests enable objective evaluation of methods for single-subject FMRI analysis.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3199190{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {2011},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Raz2003,
author = {Raz, Jonathan and Zheng, Hui and Ombao, Hernando and Turetsky, Bruce},
doi = {10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00115-0},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Raz et al. - 2003 - Statistical tests for fMRI based on experimental randomization.pdf:pdf},
issn = {10538119},
journal = {NeuroImage},
month = {jun},
number = {2},
pages = {226--232},
title = {{Statistical tests for fMRI based on experimental randomization}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811903001150},
volume = {19},
year = {2003}
}
@article{Eklund2012,
abstract = {The validity of parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis has only been reported for simulated data. Recent advances in computer science and data sharing make it possible to analyze large amounts of real fMRI data. In this study, 1484 rest datasets have been analyzed in SPM8, to estimate true familywise error rates. For a familywise significance threshold of 5{\%}, significant activity was found in 1{\%}-70{\%} of the 1484 rest datasets, depending on repetition time, paradigm and parameter settings. This means that parametric significance thresholds in SPM both can be conservative or very liberal. The main reason for the high familywise error rates seems to be that the global AR(1) auto correlation correction in SPM fails to model the spectra of the residuals, especially for short repetition times. The findings that are reported in this study cannot be generalized to parametric fMRI analysis in general, other software packages may give different results. By using the computational power of the graphics processing unit (GPU), the 1484 rest datasets were also analyzed with a random permutation test. Significant activity was then found in 1{\%}-19{\%} of the datasets. These findings speak to the need for a better model of temporal correlations in fMRI timeseries.},
author = {Eklund, Anders and Andersson, Mats and Josephson, Camilla and Johannesson, Magnus and Knutsson, Hans},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.093},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Eklund et al. - 2012 - Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1095-9572},
journal = {NeuroImage},
keywords = {Adolescent,Adult,Aged,Aged, 80 and over,Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping: methods,Databases, Factual,Evoked Potentials,Evoked Potentials: physiology,Female,Humans,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted: methods,Logistic Models,Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Male,Middle Aged,Movement,Movement: physiology,Normal Distribution,Reproducibility of Results,Rest,Rest: physiology,Software,Young Adult},
month = {jul},
number = {3},
pages = {565--78},
pmid = {22507229},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
title = {{Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets.}},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22507229},
volume = {61},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Ioannidis2005,
abstract = {There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research.},
author = {Ioannidis, John P a},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Ioannidis - 2005 - Why most published research findings are false.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1549-1676},
journal = {PLoS medicine},
keywords = {Bias (Epidemiology),Data Interpretation, Statistical,Likelihood Functions,Meta-Analysis as Topic,Odds Ratio,Publishing,Reproducibility of Results,Research Design,Sample Size},
month = {aug},
number = {8},
pages = {e124},
pmid = {16060722},
title = {{Why most published research findings are false.}},
url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1182327{\&}tool=pmcentrez{\&}rendertype=abstract},
volume = {2},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Owen2005,
author = {Owen, Art B.},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00509.x},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Owen - 2005 - Variance of the number of false discoveries.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1369-7412},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)},
keywords = {false discovery rate,microarrays,multiple comparisons,polymorphisms,single-nucleotide,step-down},
month = {jun},
number = {3},
pages = {411--426},
title = {{Variance of the number of false discoveries}},
url = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00509.x},
volume = {67},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Storey2013,
author = {Storey, John D and Taylor, Jonathan E and Siegmund, David},
file = {:Users/Joke/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Storey, Taylor, Siegmund - 2004 - Strong control , conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false disc.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology},
number = {1},
title = {{Strong control , conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates : a unified approach}},
volume = {66},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Woolrich2005,