You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been using Libra for several projects and I noticed that the avg_logFC does not equal to log(group1.exp/grou2.exp).
It's also weird that in this screenshot, the first row, foldchange equals to 5.4788/1 while the second row equals to 1.9859155/0.3636364 = 5.461267, which is smaller. However, the logFoldchange of the second row is bigger than that in the first row.
I wonder how's that happened and how did foldchange been calculated? Thank you very much!
Best,
Feiyang.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am also getting odd results with avg_logFC. For some rows, the directionality of avg_logFC matches that of the change in expression (WT.exp vs KO.exp) but for other rows it is the opposite directionality (for example below, rows 1 and 3). N.B. This is a separate issue from the assignment of the reference group.
Here is another example after making genotype and animal ID (orig.ident) factor levels both alphabetical and filtering out lowly expressed genes from the results. The avg_logFC value for the third row seems very off.
Dear developer,
I've been using Libra for several projects and I noticed that the avg_logFC does not equal to log(group1.exp/grou2.exp).
It's also weird that in this screenshot, the first row, foldchange equals to 5.4788/1 while the second row equals to 1.9859155/0.3636364 = 5.461267, which is smaller. However, the logFoldchange of the second row is bigger than that in the first row.
I wonder how's that happened and how did foldchange been calculated? Thank you very much!
Best,
Feiyang.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: