[ROADMAP] Enhancing PynneX for Backend and Data Science Applications #9
nexconnectio
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Signal-slot mechanisms are a proven and effective way to handle events in complex systems. PynneX takes this idea and implements it in a minimal, clean way, making it great for multithreaded and async workflows in Python. While it’s built around the signal/slot concept, I think it could work well far beyond just GUI development. This roadmap dives into some ideas for expanding PynneX into backend systems and data science workflows.
1. Signal/Slot in Backend Systems
Why It Matters
The signal-slot pattern isn’t just for GUIs—it’s a powerful concept for organizing complex workflows in backend systems. When you’re dealing with event-driven architectures, PynneX can act as a clean and structured way to handle things like:
However, the terms “Signal” and “Slot” often resonate strongly with GUI development, primarily due to their origins in frameworks like Qt. To emphasize that PynneX can go beyond UI contexts, we’re introducing Emitter-Listener as the modern naming convention. This helps clarify that our focus extends to broader use cases such as backend services, microservices, and data pipelines.
That said, signal-slot remains available as an alias for those who prefer the familiar Qt-style API. We also provide a publisher-subscriber alias if you come from a Pub/Sub background. Under the hood, these are simply different names pointing to the same PynneX core, so you can choose whichever naming pattern best fits your project or personal preference.
Example Use Case
Imagine a backend API that processes a large batch of data. Signals can propagate progress updates to monitoring tools, while slots manage parallel tasks, such as sending notifications or aggregating results.
2. Introducing Dispatchers for Flexible Task Execution
The Idea
What if you could control where and how each signal gets processed? Similar to Kotlin’s Dispatchers, PynneX could allow you to specify task execution environments when connecting or emitting signals. For example:
Benefits
Challenges
3. Configurable Signal/Slot Definitions via XML/JSON
The Idea
Instead of defining signals and slots with decorators, why not make them configurable through external files like XML or JSON? For example:
Benefits
Dynamic Configuration
Update signal-slot mappings without touching the code.Enterprise Flexibility:
Adjust workflows and pipelines in production without redeployment.Tooling:
Build visualization tools (e.g., drag-and-drop editors) to manage workflows more intuitively.Example Use Case
Think of a data pipeline where each step (e.g., ingestion → preprocessing → analytics) is defined in a configuration file. Non-developers could tweak the workflow by simply editing the file—no need to change the code.
4. Potential Impact on Data Science
Event-Driven Data Workflows
Signal-slot mechanisms can be a powerful tool for orchestrating data pipelines, especially when workflows require dynamic event handling. You can trigger specific steps based on incoming events or partial results, making workflows more dynamic.
Scalability
With dispatchers, you can manage resource allocation in large-scale machine learning workflows. For example:
Real-Time Analytics
PynneX can fit perfectly into real-time analytics systems. For instance:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions