Add templates to nmfs-opensci/ResourceBook

[jules32]

Ideas are here: nmfs-opensci/ResourceBook#14

(this issue is for awareness on our Project Board)

[k-doering-NOAA]

Or even more broadly - update or add to the resource book in general? I'd be interested in spending some of our co-working time on this, if anyone else is interested!

I think it would be cool to have a shared resource that is up to date and authored by many!

[k-doering-NOAA]

And related - how do we keep these awesome templates (or other resources) up to date as a community?

[jules32]

Adding this from @ateucher yesterday!

Ways to search GitHub in a more targeted way

• github.com/search/advanced - lots of options (e.g., can search by license or many other metadata options).
• There is Github documentation on the GitHub Code search syntax
• More search options are available by using qualifiers such as org:[orgname], template:true, is:issue, etc. Eg:
  • search for repositories on nmfs-opensci or nmfs-openscapes orgs that are templates: org:nmfs-opensci org:nmfs-openscapes template:true archived:false quarto
  • Search for open issues opened by Stef and assigned to Andy: is:issue assignee:ateucher is:open author:stefaniebutland
• Let me GitHub search that for you with Jenny Bryan - excellent talk on advanced search techniques in GitHub

[jules32]

I'll work on this a bit today during coworking!

[jules32]

Submitted a pull request today: nmfs-opensci/ResourceBook#15

A small change but the main next steps are to let folks know this exists!

[jmlondon]

I just wanted to take a moment and point you toward a repo where I'm actively developing a NMFS flavored stock assessment report template for Quarto + Typst.

https://github.com/noaa-afsc/nmfs-sar-template

It's still a work in progress but might provide some helpful insights for other template development

[jules32]

Excellent! Thank you @jmlondon !

[k-doering-NOAA]

I'm also wondering how the nmfs-opensci/Resource book and the FIT resources relate; there is a lot of overlap, and perhaps maintaining just one of these instead of both would be a good idea?

I would be in favor of migrating the FIT resources over to the nmfs-opensci resource book if we felt like that is the right move! (although I would want to run it by our FIT committee)