Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Comment: Wikipedia article(s) on RA #52

Open
venkatachalapathy opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Request for Comment: Wikipedia article(s) on RA #52

venkatachalapathy opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@venkatachalapathy
Copy link

As discussed in our meeting, we could think about creating a Wikipedia entry on Reconstructibility Analysis. This issue could be used to discuss what goes in it. I am happy to be part of the team or take the lead on it.

@gdcutting
Copy link
Contributor

gdcutting commented Mar 19, 2019

I'm working with some wiki-type content at my fork here: https://github.com/gdcutting/occam/wiki/Reconstructibility-Analysis-(RA)-Overview

It's definitely still in progress but this is a start. I've just been going through Marty's overview docs and trying to pare out the most essential information. Goal is to keep the language consistent with existing docs but just provider a shorter intro (wikipedia pages are typically a few thousand words, which is a fraction of the length of the Overview and Wholes and Parts papers).

One thing that I'm realizing there is a need for, particularly for a Wikipedia page (as opposed to our Github Wiki page) is a more formal definition of key RA objects (particularly relation, structure, and model). That's one component of any similar entry (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_network). Wikipedia articles of this type are short but almost always include key formal mathematical definitions.

I haven't seen a definition yet for 'relation'. 'Structure' is defined as 'a non-redundant set of projections' but this is still not very formal. We have been discussing models as hypergraphs but, again, I don't see a formal definition anywhere.

I'll still be working on this for a little while but if anyone has comments I'd be glad to hear them to get a little guidance and make sure we're all on the same page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants