You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in our meeting, we could think about creating a Wikipedia entry on Reconstructibility Analysis. This issue could be used to discuss what goes in it. I am happy to be part of the team or take the lead on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's definitely still in progress but this is a start. I've just been going through Marty's overview docs and trying to pare out the most essential information. Goal is to keep the language consistent with existing docs but just provider a shorter intro (wikipedia pages are typically a few thousand words, which is a fraction of the length of the Overview and Wholes and Parts papers).
One thing that I'm realizing there is a need for, particularly for a Wikipedia page (as opposed to our Github Wiki page) is a more formal definition of key RA objects (particularly relation, structure, and model). That's one component of any similar entry (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_network). Wikipedia articles of this type are short but almost always include key formal mathematical definitions.
I haven't seen a definition yet for 'relation'. 'Structure' is defined as 'a non-redundant set of projections' but this is still not very formal. We have been discussing models as hypergraphs but, again, I don't see a formal definition anywhere.
I'll still be working on this for a little while but if anyone has comments I'd be glad to hear them to get a little guidance and make sure we're all on the same page.
As discussed in our meeting, we could think about creating a Wikipedia entry on Reconstructibility Analysis. This issue could be used to discuss what goes in it. I am happy to be part of the team or take the lead on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: