You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Perhaps it would be a good idea to have some sort of guideline for how wallets display reinscriptions. In particular, perhaps wallets should never display reinscriptions as their own, top-level inscription and always display them linked to the first inscription on that sat, either as a stack of cards, or as a little number giving the number of reinscriptions.
Reinscriptions are often used to add additional data which isn't directly interesting to users, like code or JSON, so a display default like this would help make those "junk" inscriptions less visible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Perhaps it would be a good idea to have some sort of guideline for how wallets display reinscriptions. In particular, perhaps wallets should never display reinscriptions as their own, top-level inscription and always display them linked to the first inscription on that sat, either as a stack of cards, or as a little number giving the number of reinscriptions.
Reinscriptions are often used to add additional data which isn't directly interesting to users, like code or JSON, so a display default like this would help make those "junk" inscriptions less visible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: