2018-07-21-data-partition-and-routing.md

slug	id	title	date	comments	tags	description
2018-07-21-data-partition-and-routing	2018-07-21-data-partition-and-routing	Data Partition and Routing	2018-07-20 11:54	true	system design	The advantages of implementing data partition and routing are availability and read efficiency while consistency is the weakness. The routing abstract model is essentially two maps: key-partition map and partition-machine map.

Why data partition and routing?

large dataset ⟶ scale out ⟶ data shard / partition ⟶ 1) routing for data access 2) replica for availability

• Pros
  • availability
  • read(parallelization, single read efficiency)
• Cons
  • consistency

How to do data partition and routing?

The routing abstract model is essentially just two maps: 1) key-partition map 2) partition-machine map

Hash partition

1. hash and mod

   • (+) simple
   • (-) flexibility (tight coupling two maps: adding and removing nodes (partition-machine map) disrupt existing key-partition map)

2. Virtual buckets: key--(hash)-->vBucket, vBucket--(table lookup)-->servers

   • Usercase: Membase a.k.a Couchbase, Riak
   • (+) flexibility, decoupling two maps
   • (-) centralized lookup table

3. Consistent hashing and DHT

   • [Chord] implementation
   • virtual nodes: for load balance in heterogeneous data center
   • Usercase: Dynamo, Cassandra
   • (+) flexibility, hashing space decouples two maps. two maps use the same hash, but adding and removing nodes ==only impact succeeding nodes==.
   • (-) network complexity, hard to maintain

Range partition

sort by primary key, shard by range of primary key

range-server lookup table (e.g. HBase .META. table) + local tree-based index (e.g. LSM, B+)

(+) search for a range (-) log(n)

Usercase: Yahoo PNUTS, Azure, Bigtable