Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cilium to v1.17.0 #7698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rbrtbnfgl
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

Update Cilium to latest v1.17.0 version

Types of Changes

Verification

Testing

Linked Issues

#7697

User-Facing Change


Further Comments

Signed-off-by: Roberto Bonafiglia <roberto.bonafiglia@suse.com>
@rbrtbnfgl rbrtbnfgl requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 16:24
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.00%. Comparing base (c1e854d) to head (6688fb2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7698   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   23.00%   23.00%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        3500     3500           
=======================================
  Hits          805      805           
  Misses       2647     2647           
  Partials       48       48           
Flag Coverage Δ
inttests 8.74% <ø> (ø)
unittests 16.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rbrtbnfgl rbrtbnfgl merged commit bd73699 into rancher:master Feb 6, 2025
9 checks passed
@rbrtbnfgl rbrtbnfgl deleted the update_cilium_1.17.0 branch February 6, 2025 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants