Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2019. It is now read-only.

is there a non-browserify distribution available #4

Open
jameslaneconkling opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

is there a non-browserify distribution available #4

jameslaneconkling opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@jameslaneconkling
Copy link

dup of this rdf-ext issue

Would be useful to have a standalone distribution of this for the browser that doesn't require a browserify build pipeline. I love browserify, but in cases where you don't have control over builds (Ember CLI, in my case), a standalone distribution or bower dist is useful.

@bergos
Copy link
Contributor

bergos commented May 30, 2016

You found already the dist builder. Please try that package. The lack of documentation is caused by the lack of time to write it. That's also the reason that there is only one version of the distribution.

@jameslaneconkling
Copy link
Author

Thanks.

However, according to the builder's modules.json file, there is no rdf-parser-rdfa? Or am I misunderstanding how the modules fit together?

Specifically, I'm trying to package together an rdfa and turtle parser. Not sure if/where this functionality resides. On the rdf-ext bower distribution, I found a parseTurtle function on the root rdf module object. However, didn't find that on the dist builder bundle. And wasn't able to find the rdfa parser on any of the distributions (though probably not looking in the right place...).

Really excited to see all all these tools bundled in a single place. Thanks for the good work.

@bergos
Copy link
Contributor

bergos commented May 31, 2016

I haven't added it to the official modules, because there is still a bug with the HTML literal nodes. @csarven fixed it with this piece of code in rdflib.js, but I still hope there is an easier solution.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants