-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Question] "Soft" Constraining #2
Comments
Hi Toby, Thank you for the question. In our experiments when we put a reasonably big enough hyper-parameter Best, |
Ah, gotcha! Thanks, that cleared up my confusion so much! Keep up the good work! |
Hi again, sorry for the disruption again. |
Hi! In our experiments we were using an Ubuntu 18.04 LTS machine with an RTX 2070 installed. Not sure if Mac will run the real world control code at all, also make sure the jax library you run has whatever PRJT extension installed for your machine (in your case if you want to use mac you need this). Also we don't have any tested async training code (I guess our hardware was just good enough) |
Ah you used fully sync code? That was amazing to have 20 gradient updates at 10Hz rate... |
Yes, we actually had 20 UTD @ 20 Hz. Best of luck with your future endeavors! I will keep this issue opened in case someone has similar questions as yours. |
Hello,
Thanks for the great research paper, however I found that in the paper you added constraint term in the loss function, in this way, will the robot still shake a lot during initial training since the parameters aren't adapted to the soft constraint yet?
Thanks, this have been confusing me for a while.
Toby.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: