You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a project duration of 20y and PV with lifetime of 30y and age_installed of 0y. In the scalars results table I get a negative value for replacement_costs_during_project_lifetime for PV. When I set the PV lifetime to 20y, I get 0. So apparently when lifetime>project duration, some negative investment costs are calculated. I think the issue lies in def get_replacement_costs
Maybe this is intentional due to the remaining value of the asset after the project duration, but I still think it is confusing and should be listed under a separate variable. inputs_cuba.zip
Checklist to make sure that the bug report ist complete:
OS: your_operating_system, your_distribution
Branch: branch_name, updated on update_date
If applicable: Attach full error message
If applicable: Share screenshots/images of your problem
If applicable: Share used input data
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all,
@smartie2076 @ciaradunks @Bachibouzouk
I have a project duration of 20y and PV with lifetime of 30y and age_installed of 0y. In the scalars results table I get a negative value for replacement_costs_during_project_lifetime for PV. When I set the PV lifetime to 20y, I get 0. So apparently when lifetime>project duration, some negative investment costs are calculated. I think the issue lies in
def get_replacement_costs
Maybe this is intentional due to the remaining value of the asset after the project duration, but I still think it is confusing and should be listed under a separate variable.
inputs_cuba.zip
Checklist to make sure that the bug report ist complete:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: