Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update DataStoreRefLabel on selecting data store #67

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

theaubmov
Copy link
Collaborator

@theaubmov theaubmov commented Feb 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Data store names for 'countries' and 'foods' are now displayed in uppercase for better clarity.
    • Enhanced data store descriptions in the properties panel, dynamically providing context based on the selected data store type.
  • Enhancements
    • Improved data store management, including updating and deleting, for a smoother user experience.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed an issue in test assertions related to data store attributes for more accurate testing outcomes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve enhancing data store naming conventions, improving the dynamic setting of data store descriptions, refining data store selection and management logic, and simplifying test assertions. The changes collectively aim to improve the clarity, efficiency, and user experience of managing data stores within the application.

Changes

Files Summary
app/app.js
.../DataStorePropertiesProvider.js
Updated data store names to uppercase; dynamically set descriptions based on data store type presence.
.../DataStoreSelect.js Refined getValue and setValue functions; added logic for updating/deleting data stores; introduced attribute retrieval function.
test/spec/DataStoreReferenceSpec.js Simplified test assertions by removing suffix from data store selectors.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where changes abound,
A rabbit hopped in, improvements were found.
With a flick and a hop, the data stores gleam,
Crafting a world, where data flows like a stream.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@burnettk burnettk merged commit 160f6df into main Feb 7, 2024
1 check passed
@burnettk burnettk deleted the enhancement/data-stores branch February 7, 2024 15:06
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e79c02 and 7c09117.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • app/app.js (1 hunks)
  • app/spiffworkflow/DataStoreReference/propertiesPanel/DataStorePropertiesProvider.js (2 hunks)
  • app/spiffworkflow/DataStoreReference/propertiesPanel/DataStoreSelect.js (4 hunks)
  • test/spec/DataStoreReferenceSpec.js (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
app/spiffworkflow/DataStoreReference/propertiesPanel/DataStorePropertiesProvider.js (1)
  • 60-65: Ensure that businessObject.get('type') always returns a valid value when businessObject.dataStoreRef is not null. If type can be undefined or null, consider adding a fallback description or handling for such cases.
app/spiffworkflow/DataStoreReference/propertiesPanel/DataStoreSelect.js (3)
  • 26-26: Ensure that dtRef.id is always defined when dtRef is not null to avoid potential undefined values.
  • 23-67: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [32-86]

Consider adding error handling for cases where definitions.get('rootElements') might not return an expected array, and for when GetDataStoreAttrById returns null for any of the properties (clz, name, type).

  • 142-146: GetDataStoreAttrById should handle cases where spiffExtensionOptions['data_stores'] might not contain the requested ID, returning a default value or null. Ensure that callers of this function handle the null case appropriately.
test/spec/DataStoreReferenceSpec.js (1)
  • 86-87: LGTM! The changes correctly reflect the updated naming conventions in the assertions.
app/app.js (1)
  • 185-186: LGTM! Ensure that the updated naming conventions for 'Countries' and 'Foods' are consistently applied across the entire application to avoid mismatches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants