Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add route spec extraction command #134

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

codetheweb
Copy link
Contributor

@codetheweb codetheweb commented Jan 11, 2024

For example usage & output, see this PR on Seam Connect: https://github.com/seamapi/seam-connect/pull/5395.

@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@
"yalc": "npm run build && yalc push"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"esbuild": "^0.14.7",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

esbuild was already implicitly a peer dependency because of esbuild-register (not exactly sure why that's a peer in the first place...)

@codetheweb codetheweb marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2024 00:06
@codetheweb codetheweb requested a review from razor-x January 12, 2024 00:06
@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-route-spec-extraction branch from b598228 to 5497a16 Compare January 16, 2024 19:43
@codetheweb codetheweb changed the title Add route spec extraction command feat: Add route spec extraction command Jan 16, 2024
@codetheweb codetheweb merged commit 5c55158 into main Jan 16, 2024
2 checks passed
@codetheweb codetheweb deleted the feat-route-spec-extraction branch January 16, 2024 19:46
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2024
# [2.11.0](v2.10.1...v2.11.0) (2024-01-16)

### Features

* Add route spec extraction command ([#134](#134)) ([5c55158](5c55158))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants