You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently only the common "generic" types like number, truth etc are handled using definitions.
To enable using the schemas in a context of tasks embedded into roles and playbooks we should make the main schema a definition as well that we can further reference from sub schemas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I didn't had time to check how Ansible schema looks but based on my brief experience with other schemas this is something I was expecting.
For example, the "block" element is allowed as a task but it can contain other tasks and nobody sane is expected to define what is acceptable as a task twice :)
Currently only the common "generic" types like
number
,truth
etc are handled using definitions.To enable using the schemas in a context of tasks embedded into
roles
andplaybooks
we should make the main schema a definition as well that we can further reference from sub schemas.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: