You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was playing with the disk actuator model that is available in the RANS testcases, and I wanted to make my own mesh of the same test case geometry using gmsh. I was not able to generate a mesh with a surface that has two different distinct sides with different node indexes and markers in my mesh file. Thus since I had only a surface with "one side " I assumed that in this case, I had to change
ACTDISK_DOUBLE_SURFACE = YES
to
ACTDISK_DOUBLE_SURFACE = NO
And modify other parameters in the config files. So far, I tried many variations but none of them worked (divergence, or bad configuration of the .cfg file)
How to use correctly the disk actuator with this option set to no ? will the result be similar to the one with a two-sided disk?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi,
I was playing with the disk actuator model that is available in the RANS testcases, and I wanted to make my own mesh of the same test case geometry using gmsh. I was not able to generate a mesh with a surface that has two different distinct sides with different node indexes and markers in my mesh file. Thus since I had only a surface with "one side " I assumed that in this case, I had to change
to
And modify other parameters in the config files. So far, I tried many variations but none of them worked (divergence, or bad configuration of the .cfg file)
How to use correctly the disk actuator with this option set to no ? will the result be similar to the one with a two-sided disk?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions