Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix build and osp #6415

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Fixes build
Fixes original one-sided transaction script persistence
Ensures that spend key is always calculated correctly

@SWvheerden SWvheerden requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2024 09:54
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Test Results (CI)

    3 files    120 suites   38m 33s ⏱️
1 295 tests 1 295 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
3 877 runs  3 877 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit cb774ed.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged labels Jul 19, 2024
brianp
brianp previously approved these changes Jul 19, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Test Results (Integration tests)

 2 files  11 suites   41m 34s ⏱️
35 tests 34 ✅ 0 💤 1 ❌
37 runs  34 ✅ 0 💤 3 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit cb774ed.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Jul 19, 2024
@SWvheerden SWvheerden requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2024 13:30
@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Jul 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@AaronFeickert AaronFeickert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as a temporary fix.

@SWvheerden SWvheerden merged commit 54bccd7 into tari-project:development Jul 19, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
@AaronFeickert
Copy link
Collaborator

Added a tracking issue in #6417 just to make sure the functionality gets un-reverted (re-reverted? verted?) when stabilized.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Jul 19, 2024
@SWvheerden SWvheerden deleted the sw_fix_wallet_spends branch July 22, 2024 06:57
sdbondi added a commit to sdbondi/tari that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
* development: (93 commits)
  chore: fix build and osp (tari-project#6415)
  chore: refactor key manager names (tari-project#6411)
  fix: panic in from_base58 fn (tari-project#6414)
  fix: branch keys (tari-project#6413)
  chore: remove dependancy on ledger for common types (tari-project#6412)
  feat: count unique keys (tari-project#6401)
  feat!: fix key manager use of keys (tari-project#6407)
  refactor: remove metadata sig and use difference key branch for offset (tari-project#6400)
  feat: update ledger instructions (tari-project#6406)
  feat: add file-based input and output to faucet commands (tari-project#6405)
  chore: new release v1.0.0-pre.16 (tari-project#6404)
  feat: simplify leader sig generation (tari-project#6399)
  ci(fix): include macOS universal assets in release (tari-project#6402)
  fix: script dependance on party order (tari-project#6398)
  fix: claim n of m faucet (tari-project#6389)
  feat: add ffi features (tari-project#6390)
  chore: fix unwraps in memory key manager (tari-project#6396)
  docs: update hasher documentation (tari-project#6392)
  chore: fix ci (tari-project#6391)
  feat(miner): add SHA P2Pool mining related configuration and changes (tari-project#6370)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants