You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While you're at it, how about +/-1.96 SE's for SE-based confidence intervals? This would be nice to conveniently compare with likelihood-based confidence intervals.
Modify umxSummary to include a p-value column based on beta and SE
Table: Parameter loadings for model 'crime_model'
Model Fit: χ²(1) = 0.08, p = 0.777; CFI = 1.001; TLI = 1.004; RMSEA = 0
Algebra'i_1' = 0.043CI95[0.008, 0.079]. p-value = 0.017
Algebra'i_2' = -0.525CI95[-0.89, -0.16]. p-value = 0.005
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: