Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terms for absolute geological dates/ages #24

Open
dennereed opened this issue Nov 4, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Terms for absolute geological dates/ages #24

dennereed opened this issue Nov 4, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@dennereed
Copy link
Contributor

Add terms for absolute minimum and maximum dates for a specimen; e.g. minimumAge, maximumAge? Was this considered before? If so why omitted?

@hollyel
Copy link
Collaborator

hollyel commented Nov 6, 2017

I'm not sure about the history of whether or not this type of data was considered, but there is a proposed set of terms for chronology that was presented by @lbrensk at TDWG this year.

https://doi.org/10.3897/tdwgproceedings.1.20126

@lbrensk
Copy link

lbrensk commented Nov 6, 2017

Hey! Yes, we have been working on a chronometric dating extension for reporting absolute dates. We’ve published this work on GitHub here: https://github.com/VertNet/dwc-chronology

You can view the terms and their definitions specifically here: https://github.com/VertNet/dwc-chronology/blob/master/standard/vocabularies/term_versions.csv

We are in the process right now of getting this extension into the IPT sandbox so we can publish a data set (or a few) using it. We are also planning a Darwin Core Hour, tentatively slated for sometime in January, where we can discuss the problems associated with reporting dates as a broader community. Please feel free to take a look at the terms, ask any questions, or give feedback. I presented an example of how these would work in my TDWG Talk this year so that is also available, if not from an iDigBio archive of the meeting, then in my own personal files.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

The Chronometric Age Extension has passed public review and will now be presented to the Executive Committee for ratification. I believe this issue can be closed.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented May 1, 2021

The ChronometricAge vocabulary enhancement has now been ratified. Please close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants