You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a good description with examples in the general Darwin Core QA thread on the use of taxonomic fields for neontological and paleontological data.
It is important to serve both dwc:higherClassification and dwc:taxonRank for paleo specimens. These terms help aggregators and downstream users better understand the given taxonomy. It would also ideally help to improve the cleaning algorithms used by the aggregators in the long-term as we work with them to improve that process. An additional thread will need to be added to discuss the larger taxonomy problems that exist in GBIF and iDigBio (and other portals probably). I also imagine we may need to break this out into multiple issue threads for various terms.
hollyel
added
the
Taxon
used to denote issues related to terms in the DwC taxon class
label
Oct 24, 2018
I realize this also doesn't answer your question directly, but in tdwg/bdq#173 we proposed starting to use identificationVerificationStatus as another field to help aggregators know if your identification information should be matched up with taxon ids from some backbone or just treated as-is. An example would be new species that are not in any backbone yet.
The main Darwin Core repo also has an open ticket to add examples for this term: tdwg/dwc#141
Parking this thought here - feel free to split tickets and rework later.
There is a good description with examples in the general Darwin Core QA thread on the use of taxonomic fields for neontological and paleontological data.
tdwg/dwc-qa#48
Is there a good resource for providing taxonIDs (i.e. URIs for taxa) for paleobiology?
Is there a way to record whether a taxon is extant or extinct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: