We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sometimes we can't write some complicated filters with AQ because we have multiple conditions and subconditions :
((id == 1 || id == 2 || id == 3) && color.Contains("blue")) || (quantity >= 5 && quantity < 10)
We need to add a new filter clause (while keeping the old way) to make complicated filters like this :
filter=or(and(id(1,2,3),color(contains=blue),quantity(>=5,<10))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @trenoncourt I've just come across this issue and it seems to be the very functionality that we are looking for.
I'm wondering if we can already perform a simple logical OR across 2 different fields, or whether this would be part of this enhancement?
OR
e.g. name.Contains("John") OR surname.Contains("Smith")
Sorry, something went wrong.
hi @jsancho,
Sorry, not yet implemented, but in roadmap !
No branches or pull requests
Sometimes we can't write some complicated filters with AQ because we have multiple conditions and subconditions :
We need to add a new filter clause (while keeping the old way) to make complicated filters like this :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: